As a matter of practice and playing the devils advocate, what are the arguable reasons for the Big Tech media platforms on a USPS Point-of-Sale? Has the Big Tech media platforms become PUBLIC DOMAIN UTILITIES or are they BUSINESSES WITH TERMS OF USE AGREEMENTS?
Also, I'm trying to connect the dots with regards to the practice of a USPS POS worker utilizing the Big Tech media platforms.
Citizen walks to the counter and is profiled by the USPS employee as a member of a different class of citizen, religion or political affiliation.
USPS employee attends to the citizen postal requirements.
Citizen receives products, packages or sends package and exits the POS area.
USPS employee remembers the name of said citizen and initiates searches of previous citizen and begins a dossier file on citizen.
Now, this is a clear violation of privacy or the appearance thereof.
If you as a citizen witness the mere appearance of the ability of public servants this research power, there must be mechanism in place to hold the public servants/process accountable.
The means to do this are known as GRAND JURY COMPLAINTS. The GRAND JURY is specifically tasks to investigate government employees and agencies illegal acts.
In this case I would document in the finest of detail; time, place, who, what, etc to get the ball rolling.
The argument that those media platforms are available for research by employees is problematic and standards and law should be established. Without complaint and due process they will get away with it, just like L Ron Hubbard became a religous organization and not a business, no complaints or precedant prevented it.
Thanks Anon, "The devil is in the details."
As a matter of practice and playing the devils advocate, what are the arguable reasons for the Big Tech media platforms on a USPS Point-of-Sale? Has the Big Tech media platforms become PUBLIC DOMAIN UTILITIES or are they BUSINESSES WITH TERMS OF USE AGREEMENTS?
Also, I'm trying to connect the dots with regards to the practice of a USPS POS worker utilizing the Big Tech media platforms.
Now, this is a clear violation of privacy or the appearance thereof.
If you as a citizen witness the mere appearance of the ability of public servants this research power, there must be mechanism in place to hold the public servants/process accountable.
The means to do this are known as GRAND JURY COMPLAINTS. The GRAND JURY is specifically tasks to investigate government employees and agencies illegal acts.
In this case I would document in the finest of detail; time, place, who, what, etc to get the ball rolling.
The argument that those media platforms are available for research by employees is problematic and standards and law should be established. Without complaint and due process they will get away with it, just like L Ron Hubbard became a religous organization and not a business, no complaints or precedant prevented it.