Big ML fan. Love what he is doing for the patriot movement. But here's what I run into when I share this video with people I'm trying to educate about the fraud: They say "There's no proof. You're just taking his word for it."
I realize that there is all sorts of proof out there, so no need to dump it all here. The real issue is that if ML's videos are at the tip of the spear, then we need to be able to make the normies believe the credibility of the expert guests. We know that the normies and the opposition will dismiss the videos due to cognitive dissonance or simple oppositional defiance,
What can we encourage ML to do to make his evidence transcend himself and his guests... something that would be along the lines of Doubting Thomas having a chance to put his own fingers in the holes in Christ's hands? I fear that the most incredible thing is occurring in our culture: the plethora of information (accurate and disinfo) is leading to confusion and distrust of ALL information unless it comes from a source that is aligned with what you already believe. Do we truly realize the ramifications of this pattern?
Anyway, how can we help ML? What would help his evidence be irrefutable even to the opposition? Thanks for thinking about it.
Anyone who says this clearly did not watch the video. I would ask them why. And if they lie and tell you they did, ask them what portion of the video was opinion based and nothing more than "his word".
I've had this conversation many times. Those who didn't watch it all had stopped after 30 minutes or so. Those who then watched the last 30 minutes at my request (if they weren't willing to watch the full two hours) still came back and said in so many words: "Yeah, I get it... he paid a guy to come on and talk about encryption, yadda yadda, and guess what, I could do that do if I had a boatload of money, and pay my guy to say the opposite script." I shrug and say, "Well, at the very least you have to be curious enough to start digging for the truth yourself, so I hope you do..."