If you ignore the evidence that presents itself simply because you dislike some (otherwise unrelated) activity of the source, you miss out on potential essential steps on the path to truth.
Some of the best pieces of evidence I have seen come from the words of the NWO/elite/Luciferians themselves.
yes I definitely agree, but it didn't seem like that was OPs intent to me, so that's why I wanted a clarification. to me, it sounded like making excuses for the elite.
Fair enough. I just didn't want anyone to dismiss Freud or anyone else for that matter just because of "he defended pedophilia? I don't know about you, but that alone is enough for me to not listen to anything that evil shit has to say."
Of course it wasn't you that said that, and I should have perhaps responded to that person directly. I guess I misassociated that statement with the post that inspired that statement (yours). My apologies.
If you ignore the evidence that presents itself simply because you dislike some (otherwise unrelated) activity of the source, you miss out on potential essential steps on the path to truth.
Some of the best pieces of evidence I have seen come from the words of the NWO/elite/Luciferians themselves.
yes I definitely agree, but it didn't seem like that was OPs intent to me, so that's why I wanted a clarification. to me, it sounded like making excuses for the elite.
Fair enough. I just didn't want anyone to dismiss Freud or anyone else for that matter just because of "he defended pedophilia? I don't know about you, but that alone is enough for me to not listen to anything that evil shit has to say."
Of course it wasn't you that said that, and I should have perhaps responded to that person directly. I guess I misassociated that statement with the post that inspired that statement (yours). My apologies.