Why'd Q tell us he would be banned? What did banning Trump accomplish when we can still see his words? Who else was banned? Who did we follow that is a "Trump proxy" to still get info? Names are meaningless. Information is priceless.
Let's try to stay on topic. I am not opposed to the Military taking over twitter, also not opposed to them letting the deep state play their hand. This is the only point you make that I am somewhat open to believing. However I highly doubt it. The enemy will squeal when the military comes for them, no matter who is CIC.
Not all comms are 100% controlled. That's asinine to assume.
Please keep this in mind when you start throwing around grand ideas like companies being taken over by military, yet not enough to have control.
Define honeypot.
Yes, they conduct their criminal conversations on twitter, where SIGINT collects everything, control of twitter or not. Define half-baked.
Studies show people are 8 times more likely to research something when one of those stickers is slapped on something. Kind of like "Stay off the grass" signs. If they wanted you fact checked you'd be in a chair surrounded by 8 dudes with guns reeducating you.
Please show me that study, because anecdotally, it is wrong.
People believing he isn't still President like you just did.
Oh forgive me. Yes. Trump is President. So he is but he isn't. Has no power but all the power. Has no control and all the control. Which is it?
Black and white thinking is useful if you don't want to find yourself looking for JFK jr.
It is all or nothing, rather than conveniently just right of center.
My point was "we have everything". Keeping twitter up serves no purpose unless there is something criminal going on behind the scenes that we don't know about. And if there is, why the fuck would they use Twitter, when it has been proven that SIGINT can/could be avoided through other means.
I am aware of how a sting works. Is getting on a message board years prior to the sting and low-key disseminating info to foretell people of the sting count as "spooking before the cage drops"?
Which left wing source is leaking "right wing biased information"? Besides if this sting works as many say it will, the info won't have to be biased, it will just seem it to the sheep.
Asking questions is good for the uninitiated. I like my questions answered with answers, not more questions.
I don't know the first thing about Hegelian Dialectics. But I can tell you that some things must be in conjunction if they are going to make sense. Is there not a global/national civil war? I've never forgotten it's been like this for a long time. I'm not sure what any of that has to do with this.
Think Socratic debate, where we convey ideas and concepts instead of doing our best Q impression.
Telling the truth is not "slowly undoing" brainwashing. It's telling the truth. Twitter or no the truth will be revealed. I understand what you're trying to say, but why jump through 3 hoops when you can just do it to begin with?
Why'd Q tell us he would be banned? What did banning Trump accomplish when we can still see his words? Who else was banned? Who did we follow that is a "Trump proxy" to still get info? Names are meaningless. Information is priceless.
Not all comms are 100% controlled. That's asinine to assume.
Define honeypot.
Studies show people are 8 times more likely to research something when one of those stickers is slapped on something. Kind of like "Stay off the grass" signs. If they wanted you fact checked you'd be in a chair surrounded by 8 dudes with guns reeducating you.
People believing he isn't still President like you just did.
Black and white thinking is useful if you don't want to find yourself looking for JFK jr.
It is all or nothing, rather than conveniently just right of center.
My point was "we have everything". Keeping twitter up serves no purpose unless there is something criminal going on behind the scenes that we don't know about. And if there is, why the fuck would they use Twitter, when it has been proven that SIGINT can/could be avoided through other means.
I am aware of how a sting works. Is getting on a message board years prior to the sting and low-key disseminating info to foretell people of the sting count as "spooking before the cage drops"?
Which left wing source is leaking "right wing biased information"? Besides if this sting works as many say it will, the info won't have to be biased, it will just seem it to the sheep.
Asking questions is good for the uninitiated. I like my questions answered with answers, not more questions.
I don't know the first thing about Hegelian Dialectics. But I can tell you that some things must be in conjunction if they are going to make sense. Is there not a global/national civil war? I've never forgotten it's been like this for a long time. I'm not sure what any of that has to do with this.
Think Socratic debate, where we convey ideas and concepts instead of doing our best Q impression.
Telling the truth is not "slowly undoing" brainwashing. It's telling the truth. Twitter or no the truth will be revealed. I understand what you're trying to say, but why jump through 3 hoops when you can just do it to begin with?