A) He didn't say "Joe Biden is a fine man". He says he's not commenting on Joe Biden's "merits as a person". He's keeping it factual.
B) He never said Trump was a bad man/not a good man. He was again, keeping it factual - I'm not here to discuss what others view Donald Trump's character as.
That is normal, non-emotive, reasoned logic. You keep your personal opinions out of it. That's how smart, educated people debate situations.
Emotionally driven, spiteful people (like your Rachel Maddows, Lemons and Joy Reids) argue with no logic or reasoning, hence why everything they say are emotionally charged attacks.
You just made a mistake in your interpretation of the situation. Tucker has made his mistakes too.
Focus on the merits of the situation and not on how your personal view clouds it.
"We're not here to discuss his MERITS as a human being". Merit indicates positive attributes. When tucker talked about trump he'd say flaws or the kind of man he (trump) is. Always a negative connotation
Enough to make an "educated " judgement, which by the was is a nasty little dig against anyone who disagrees with you, isn't it? You have no idea what my education is, and it's also irrelevant and thus personal and emotional, Mr. Spock.
I listened to every one of his shows including the one just after the election where he declared there was cheating but not enough to affect the outcome and this after we had a steady stream of news about late night dumps, burned ballots, ballots driven over state lines, spikes of all biden dumps, 200% turnouts....he concluded there was cheating but not enough to affect the outcome. Tucker is a self serving cuck who thinks Hunter is a fine man.
I understand the rules of debate. I also understand the nature of slimeballs.
A) He didn't say "Joe Biden is a fine man". He says he's not commenting on Joe Biden's "merits as a person". He's keeping it factual. B) He never said Trump was a bad man/not a good man. He was again, keeping it factual - I'm not here to discuss what others view Donald Trump's character as.
That is normal, non-emotive, reasoned logic. You keep your personal opinions out of it. That's how smart, educated people debate situations.
Emotionally driven, spiteful people (like your Rachel Maddows, Lemons and Joy Reids) argue with no logic or reasoning, hence why everything they say are emotionally charged attacks.
You just made a mistake in your interpretation of the situation. Tucker has made his mistakes too. Focus on the merits of the situation and not on how your personal view clouds it.
"We're not here to discuss his MERITS as a human being". Merit indicates positive attributes. When tucker talked about trump he'd say flaws or the kind of man he (trump) is. Always a negative connotation Enough to make an "educated " judgement, which by the was is a nasty little dig against anyone who disagrees with you, isn't it? You have no idea what my education is, and it's also irrelevant and thus personal and emotional, Mr. Spock.
I listened to every one of his shows including the one just after the election where he declared there was cheating but not enough to affect the outcome and this after we had a steady stream of news about late night dumps, burned ballots, ballots driven over state lines, spikes of all biden dumps, 200% turnouts....he concluded there was cheating but not enough to affect the outcome. Tucker is a self serving cuck who thinks Hunter is a fine man.
I understand the rules of debate. I also understand the nature of slimeballs.