It's safer to have a parent stay home (yes, it is possible when you give up some luxuries) or use a home daycare of someone you or someone you know is familiar with. Your smart ass answer is just that.
No, it actually makes real-world common sense, unlike candy-coated solutions that might work for a small fraction of couples with professional careers.
You said that my suggestion would only work as a candy coated solution for career professionals. Implying that only wealthy people could afford to do what I suggested. Which would therefore imply that poorer people couldn't do it.
It's safer to have a parent stay home (yes, it is possible when you give up some luxuries) or use a home daycare of someone you or someone you know is familiar with. Your smart ass answer is just that.
No, it actually makes real-world common sense, unlike candy-coated solutions that might work for a small fraction of couples with professional careers.
Nope. If people were as poor as you're implying, that they couldn't have a parent stay home, then they wouldn't be able to afford daycares either.
'Professional careers' does not imply poverty, Lily.
You said that my suggestion would only work as a candy coated solution for career professionals. Implying that only wealthy people could afford to do what I suggested. Which would therefore imply that poorer people couldn't do it.