It is only a link in the system. You can no use cash at all, or develop a cash economy around yourself that does not use the bank. Perhaps a hybrid model, where you pay your bills online and keep cash budgeted to circulate in its own bubble. I.e try to put more cash IN the tin than taking away from it. This means getting people to pay you in cash. That way, you don't need to go to the machines.
Printed Cash is still in circulation, and taking that away from the system is a massive step. There are plenty of people who use it and would be disadvantaged without it. Although I would not put it past them to try.
The problem is that without cash, people start swapping things. And that is most difficult of all to manage at a federal tax level. They don't want to go there.
Moral of story: Cash is a living system that reacts to change in a non-linear way. Tweaking one small part of it, will either have no effect, or a disastrous one that is impossible to control.
I think we are in the former situation, i.e. nothing will happen. It will not force people to vaccinate in order to get THEIR cash. It will, however, make people creative and think about how to circumvent the stupid, ideological rule.
The latter situation, i.e. disastrous, would mean crypto or precious metals. There are some obstacles for that though, i.e. you cannot as of yet, ask the baker to take a silver ounce for his work, but guess what? Everyone becomes a silver bull in a crisis, so that transformation may become immediate when the streets are filled with 100 000 000 dollar notes. By some accounts this can happen in eighteen months.
It may be some time before the vital tradesmen accept bitcoin as payment, but then again, why not, it is only a matter of a hour's research to open an trading account and a wallet?.
It is only a link in the system. You can no use cash at all, or develop a cash economy around yourself that does not use the bank. Perhaps a hybrid model, where you pay your bills online and keep cash budgeted to circulate in its own bubble. I.e try to put more cash IN the tin than taking away from it. This means getting people to pay you in cash. That way, you don't need to go to the machines.
Printed Cash is still in circulation, and taking that away from the system is a massive step. There are plenty of people who use it and would be disadvantaged without it. Although I would not put it past them to try. The problem is that without cash, people start swapping things. And that is most difficult of all to manage at a federal tax level. They don't want to go there.
Moral of story: Cash is a living system that reacts to change in a non-linear way. Tweaking one small part of it, will either have no effect, or a disastrous one that is impossible to control.
I think we are in the former situation, i.e. nothing will happen. It will not force people to vaccinate in order to get THEIR cash. It will, however, make people creative and think about how to circumvent the stupid, ideological rule.
The latter situation, i.e. disastrous, would mean crypto or precious metals. There are some obstacles for that though, i.e. you cannot as of yet, ask the baker to take a silver ounce for his work, but guess what? Everyone becomes a silver bull in a crisis, so that transformation may become immediate when the streets are filled with 100 000 000 dollar notes. By some accounts this can happen in eighteen months.
It may be some time before the vital tradesmen accept bitcoin as payment, but then again, why not, it is only a matter of a hour's research to open an trading account and a wallet?.