UPDATE Sorry for the delay but I have a valid reason. So I originally bought the commenter suggested UV-B tube light from Petsmart that gave very little detail to my ballot. With the exception of the fact that lettering and the actual texture of the paper “popped” a little bit more. Not happy with that lackluster result I proceeded to drive all around L.A. looking for black lights... here’s the thing, you’d think with a city this size you’d find black lights on every street corner... turns out they are either a very popular item or not popular enough to warrant stocking the shelves with them. Anyway, I finally found a “urine detecting” light (Petco) that a fren in the comments had suggested. Although it basically yielded the same results as the first light - no definitive, eye-popping mark on the paper BUT - and I think this has to do with the “off the shelfness” of the bulbs I’m using - the urine light every so often would hit the paper in a way that showed what I could only describe as white looking markings you might get from a Japanese calligraphy brush. Just random looking brush strokes on the paper itself that looked almost like stretch marks you’d see on someone’s skin that I couldn’t capture as much as I tried with my iPhone. I’m positive if I had the correct light these marking would be easily seen by the naked eye.
All that said, there is most definitely ultra-tiny black specks all over the paper that are not in the fiber itself but are printed on the surface. These “specks” were alluded to back in November when everyone was speculating about “hidden” identification markings on the ballots. I don’t think these specks are what those audit workers are looking at.
I’m heading out tomorrow to get a straight-up novelty black light from Spencer’s Gifts in a mall not too far from where I live just to see if those purple looking poster black lights have better luck.
One commenter has suggested going to a military supply store to try out night vision gear, here’s my only doubt about that tech, the people doing the audit in Arizona are only very briefly putting the ballots inside those black boxes and they aren’t wearing any goggles or gear to help look at the ballots. Is there night vision tech that doesn’t need the aid of goggles but can be seen with the naked eye? If the Spencer’s light I buy tomorrow doesn’t do anything I’ll go to the nearest Army surplus store and hopefully I won’t be laughed out of the building with my strange request.
About the photo, the blue light is from the urine light from Petco. The other bulbs (seen in the lower right hand corner) put out a color that looked white like a standard light bulb.
A true "black light" doesn't look like it is even turned on, because the ultraviolet light is not visible to the human eye. Those cheap "black light" bulbs have minimal UV, so until you get a strong, true, UV source, you may not be able to see any significant marks that are intended to only be visible under UV light.
Heh. No shit. :p My home system consists of 5 cameras, and I have 73 at work. I use IR outside. It just looks like normal UV blacklight light to me. But I 100% respect your right to your own opinion. :) Hopefully we will find out one day soon!
This is for those who were following this post here: https://greatawakening.win/p/12iNQ4Y9Dz/i-found-my-official-ballot--im-o/
UPDATE Sorry for the delay but I have a valid reason. So I originally bought the commenter suggested UV-B tube light from Petsmart that gave very little detail to my ballot. With the exception of the fact that lettering and the actual texture of the paper “popped” a little bit more. Not happy with that lackluster result I proceeded to drive all around L.A. looking for black lights... here’s the thing, you’d think with a city this size you’d find black lights on every street corner... turns out they are either a very popular item or not popular enough to warrant stocking the shelves with them. Anyway, I finally found a “urine detecting” light (Petco) that a fren in the comments had suggested. Although it basically yielded the same results as the first light - no definitive, eye-popping mark on the paper BUT - and I think this has to do with the “off the shelfness” of the bulbs I’m using - the urine light every so often would hit the paper in a way that showed what I could only describe as white looking markings you might get from a Japanese calligraphy brush. Just random looking brush strokes on the paper itself that looked almost like stretch marks you’d see on someone’s skin that I couldn’t capture as much as I tried with my iPhone. I’m positive if I had the correct light these marking would be easily seen by the naked eye.
All that said, there is most definitely ultra-tiny black specks all over the paper that are not in the fiber itself but are printed on the surface. These “specks” were alluded to back in November when everyone was speculating about “hidden” identification markings on the ballots. I don’t think these specks are what those audit workers are looking at.
I’m heading out tomorrow to get a straight-up novelty black light from Spencer’s Gifts in a mall not too far from where I live just to see if those purple looking poster black lights have better luck.
One commenter has suggested going to a military supply store to try out night vision gear, here’s my only doubt about that tech, the people doing the audit in Arizona are only very briefly putting the ballots inside those black boxes and they aren’t wearing any goggles or gear to help look at the ballots. Is there night vision tech that doesn’t need the aid of goggles but can be seen with the naked eye? If the Spencer’s light I buy tomorrow doesn’t do anything I’ll go to the nearest Army surplus store and hopefully I won’t be laughed out of the building with my strange request.
About the photo, the blue light is from the urine light from Petco. The other bulbs (seen in the lower right hand corner) put out a color that looked white like a standard light bulb.
A true "black light" doesn't look like it is even turned on, because the ultraviolet light is not visible to the human eye. Those cheap "black light" bulbs have minimal UV, so until you get a strong, true, UV source, you may not be able to see any significant marks that are intended to only be visible under UV light.
In the live audit feed the box does glow blue on camera.
The camera see light frequencies better than your eyes.
Heh. No shit. :p My home system consists of 5 cameras, and I have 73 at work. I use IR outside. It just looks like normal UV blacklight light to me. But I 100% respect your right to your own opinion. :) Hopefully we will find out one day soon!
True, point your remote control at your camera with the image on!