You said earlier that Q wasn’t about predictions, remember?
Again, what about the predictions that didn’t come true?
Do you know what cold reading is?
It’s a method by self-proclaimed “psychics” to predict a person’s life story or future. Sometimes cold readings are accurate, and sometimes they’re flat-out wrong. Regardless, the method is simply a form of manipulation.
Nothing you have stated has given me a reason to trust the original Q posts on an anonymous message board. I don’t trust random anonymous people on the internet simply because other people trust them.
I’m aware of baking ideas, etc..
I’m saying to question the very, very beginning. The original Q posts that started everything.
Why do you trust those initial posts at face value?
Exactly.
You trusted a random internet person’s original posts because other people trusted those posts.
Which means, if the original posts were lies or manipulation, any fruit that bore from them would be formed around lies.
If there is no way to validate the original Q poster, everything that formed around Q could technically be invalid.
You said earlier that Q wasn’t about predictions, remember?
Again, what about the predictions that didn’t come true?
Do you know what cold reading is? It’s a method by self-proclaimed “psychics” to predict a person’s life story or future. Sometimes cold readings are accurate, and sometimes they’re flat-out wrong. Regardless, the method is simply a form of manipulation.
Nothing you have stated has given me a reason to trust the original Q posts on an anonymous message board. I don’t trust random anonymous people on the internet simply because other people trust them.