I’m not judging, but did you go to college? This type of thinking is not that deep, it’s literally the basics of an early college education.
Maybe this type of information blows your mind, but it just reminds me of when everyone was watching Fight Club in college and acting all edgy. In case you haven’t seen it, the movie glorifies this Q outlook and nihilism in general.
Add multiple layers of 'coincidences' which mathematically proves legitimacy (standard deviation)
Not true, actually, coincidences do not prove legitimacy. Proving an evidence-based hypothesis more than once proves legitimacy.
But those are all assumptions. You’re just saying that your assumptions are fact before testing them. Same as the video. The guy states a bunch of assumptions, and then believes that his assumptions are fact without testing them.
For example, a person might make this assumption: “my microwave is monitoring me.”
While another person might say, “Not true, your microwave is not monitoring you.”
So they test the assumption and dissect the microwave, and realize the second person was correct, and the assumption was incorrect.
The problem with all of your claims is that they never leave the realm of assumption.
Start to ask yourself why things don't make sense. You guys seem to be very upset about everything happening right now with "break away realities" and an increase in the number of "crazy Trump Q people."
This is actually incorrect. Things are going fine for me and people like me. Life is good, I just got a new girlfriend, my stocks are up, and the weather is finally warming up, it’s great. Occasionally, I’ll poke my head in here to see what the new Q trend is, or the new hopium trend. It’s entertaining to watch, albeit kind of sad.
I’m not judging, but did you go to college? This type of thinking is not that deep, it’s literally the basics of an early college education.
Maybe this type of information blows your mind, but it just reminds me of when everyone was watching Fight Club in college and acting all edgy. In case you haven’t seen it, the movie glorifies this Q outlook and nihilism in general.
Not true, actually, coincidences do not prove legitimacy. Proving an evidence-based hypothesis more than once proves legitimacy.
We just went over this, I never stated I went through every Q post or what that was.
Just explain your point, and then we can discuss.
Although, to be fair, you already answered my question earlier, so I’m not sure why you’re asking.
What? What is childish demeaning filth? I was just curious about your education because Q posts just sound like college talking points.
But those are all assumptions. You’re just saying that your assumptions are fact before testing them. Same as the video. The guy states a bunch of assumptions, and then believes that his assumptions are fact without testing them.
For example, a person might make this assumption: “my microwave is monitoring me.”
While another person might say, “Not true, your microwave is not monitoring you.”
So they test the assumption and dissect the microwave, and realize the second person was correct, and the assumption was incorrect.
The problem with all of your claims is that they never leave the realm of assumption.
This is actually incorrect. Things are going fine for me and people like me. Life is good, I just got a new girlfriend, my stocks are up, and the weather is finally warming up, it’s great. Occasionally, I’ll poke my head in here to see what the new Q trend is, or the new hopium trend. It’s entertaining to watch, albeit kind of sad.