Obviously, some things can be drawn to conclusion, like gravity or the weather.
However, when it comes to nuanced situations regarding people and their thoughts, you have to scrutinize your own biases more thoroughly.
For example, from that video, maybe Kanye was giving a Masonic handshake to Jay-Z or maybe he was giving a half-hearted high five because of the reach? I’ve done that plenty of times, and it never meant a Masonic handshake, I just wasn’t paying attention to giving a high-five. You see what I mean?
The world is complex and nuanced. Not everything can be explained by using your own personal belief system. Certain things need to be double-checked and scrutinized more critically.
The original Q posts were debunked by 4chan users, which would mean any projections from a consensus would be based on faulty information.
Just because a large group of people agree on the same biases, it doesn’t mean the original information is not fake. Large groups of people used to think the world was flat. I mean, 4chan was a notorious shitpost site, posters were constantly trying to fuck with groups of IRL people.
Don’t you think it’s strange that most Q followers are from the boomer generation? Why do you think that happened?
No, you’re misunderstanding me.
Obviously, some things can be drawn to conclusion, like gravity or the weather.
However, when it comes to nuanced situations regarding people and their thoughts, you have to scrutinize your own biases more thoroughly.
For example, from that video, maybe Kanye was giving a Masonic handshake to Jay-Z or maybe he was giving a half-hearted high five because of the reach? I’ve done that plenty of times, and it never meant a Masonic handshake, I just wasn’t paying attention to giving a high-five. You see what I mean?
The world is complex and nuanced. Not everything can be explained by using your own personal belief system. Certain things need to be double-checked and scrutinized more critically.
Earlier, you said you trusted the original Q posts because other people did as well. How do you know that those people weren’t being misled?
Start at the source, anything you believed after those original posts is just confirmation bias.
The original Q posts were debunked by 4chan users, which would mean any projections from a consensus would be based on faulty information.
Just because a large group of people agree on the same biases, it doesn’t mean the original information is not fake. Large groups of people used to think the world was flat. I mean, 4chan was a notorious shitpost site, posters were constantly trying to fuck with groups of IRL people.
Don’t you think it’s strange that most Q followers are from the boomer generation? Why do you think that happened?