It is claimed to be a living and breathing document subject to change at the whim of radical socialists, soon to be re-written and replaced as our forefathers may have owned slaves - therefore it is also a racist document that must be substituted with the communist manifesto.
That's literally against the Constitution.
What is this Constitution of which you speak?
It is claimed to be a living and breathing document subject to change at the whim of radical socialists, soon to be re-written and replaced as our forefathers may have owned slaves - therefore it is also a racist document that must be substituted with the communist manifesto.
Got ammo?