Well that's good news. Once the Arizona audit is over the cat will be out of the bag as far as exactly what is being looked at and how closely so I don't see problem with revealing how the audit is to proceed. Charge!
We should still demand he recuse himself. I don’t trust him to not be giving us a false sense of security to later turn against the audit. The first judge was in place before the attorney joined forcing the first judge to recuse himself. It should have been that the lawyer recuse himself after joking the “team” late in the “game!”
Well that's good news. Once the Arizona audit is over the cat will be out of the bag as far as exactly what is being looked at and how closely so I don't see problem with revealing how the audit is to proceed. Charge!
That was my thought as well. I'm not sure how "revealing the process" was a victory for the democrats.
Fraud vitiates everything.
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/98/61/ I think that’s the purpose of the audit; to prove there was fraud.
Fraud vitiates every thing.
As a "Senate attorney", you would think he would know that.
But there’s no systemic fraud! It’s just a few invalid votes! ?
Somebody forgot to tell Associated Press that this is a whole lot more than a "recount".
We should still demand he recuse himself. I don’t trust him to not be giving us a false sense of security to later turn against the audit. The first judge was in place before the attorney joined forcing the first judge to recuse himself. It should have been that the lawyer recuse himself after joking the “team” late in the “game!”