Victory today but tomorrow the judge will actually make an official ruling. The new Maricopa County Judge Martin did not extend the injunction today after an hour-plus long hearing. The audit in Arizona continues for now. Judge Martin says he will rule on the TRO tomorrow at 10:30AM.
He stated: "the Senate has the authority to audit but must balance that with the constitutional rights of voters." He added later: "I'm not persuaded that rights of voters in Maricopa County are being protected,” i.e. he may enforce the TRO tomorrow. Judge said that issue is central to the case.
This was awesome! Honestly, I think the good guys withheld transparency so that there would be a legal battle. They had the GOP judge removed and a Dem judge appointed to rule that they need to provide transparency (which, really, duh?! It is being done on behalf of the public, with video cameras everywhere-- is transparency really even an issue?) And they beat the attempt to stop it. So, if info comes out about fraud, the Dems can say, "you didn't tell us the process" or "the judge was biased". It was so awesome to have that realization while listening to the attorneys present their information and then to have the judge come back and rule exactly as we would want. Go AZ audit! Let's reveal the corruption!!!
Goodness! Is there ANYTHING that can stop what is coming?!
I checked before posting and it is confirmed.....NOTHING
An exhaustive list of things that can stop what's coming:
???? love it!
President Trump won and the whole world knows it.
Victory today but tomorrow the judge will actually make an official ruling. The new Maricopa County Judge Martin did not extend the injunction today after an hour-plus long hearing. The audit in Arizona continues for now. Judge Martin says he will rule on the TRO tomorrow at 10:30AM.
He stated: "the Senate has the authority to audit but must balance that with the constitutional rights of voters." He added later: "I'm not persuaded that rights of voters in Maricopa County are being protected,” i.e. he may enforce the TRO tomorrow. Judge said that issue is central to the case.
I listened to the hearing and this is not at all what I heard. Not sure where you are getting this?
This was awesome! Honestly, I think the good guys withheld transparency so that there would be a legal battle. They had the GOP judge removed and a Dem judge appointed to rule that they need to provide transparency (which, really, duh?! It is being done on behalf of the public, with video cameras everywhere-- is transparency really even an issue?) And they beat the attempt to stop it. So, if info comes out about fraud, the Dems can say, "you didn't tell us the process" or "the judge was biased". It was so awesome to have that realization while listening to the attorneys present their information and then to have the judge come back and rule exactly as we would want. Go AZ audit! Let's reveal the corruption!!!