Looks like the light boxes are gone from the AZ Audit
(azaudit.org)
Comments (15)
sorted by:
What is this fuckery?!
Didn't they add more tables for the hand counting of ballots yesterday? My guess is that they needed the people that were doing the UV lights to instead do the hand counting.
But I'm only speculating.
I’m hoping because the mail in ballots were on a certain pallet and when another pallet of mail comes in, they will scan for folds? Gotta keep my hope up. Would love to have a leak of numbers so far....
Good point on whether they are checking for folds or not.
I'd like to see some numbers also but if they come out and they are showing massive fraud, I think it tips our hand a bit too early. Maybe better for it to come out at the end as one large surprise?
I saw in some post yesterday that DEMS blamed UVs on the judge cause they could harm the ballot permanently if passed under UV without gloves and shits, when i checked the night there were still 1 on the blue and red or green tables, but others were gone, now seems that all are gone, and also, ballots box have been moved from the fence on the left of forensic tables, mhhh
Since by law the ballots could be destroyed 6 moos. after the election, May 6, and would have been if it weren't for this audit, that argument is ridiculous.
I don't know so well US laws but, AFAK it was nearly 2 years, 22 months of retention, not 6, but i may be wrong
You may be right (and obviously it should be that long). It surely varies by state though, even for Federal elections the states write their own laws. That's why there are so many court battles now, many relate to different state laws.
ps
I see there is this Federal law I didn't know about https://www.wgbh.org/news/local-news/2021/01/07/now-what-happens-with-all-those-2020-election-ballots-theyll-be-around-longer-than-you-might-think
I still think it might be challenged by a crooked state as unconstitutional.
It's not ridiculous because they can be destroyed eventually, its ridiculous because it has no basis in fact. There is no evidence, nor theoretical position that supports the claim that UVA or UVB plus touching with hands will cause any noticeable degradation of a ballot. This was nothing but a spell cast. People will be inclined to believe, without evidence, anything that they fear might be true.
If they have insufficient knowledge on a topic, that is the most likely scenario; i.e. someone will choose to believe something if you give them a reason to fear it might be true.
Of course it takes 15 seconds of experimentation to show how its not true, but that's work. Work is hard. Belief based on lies that cause fear is easy.
Quite right, all the left has is fear.
When are they supposed to have this completed? When do we get the results?
Thank you!