VAERs is back dating data. Real numbers are estimated to be much higher!
(childrenshealthdefense.org)
Comments (7)
sorted by:
And remember, they say that only about one percent get reported there. How high are the death and disability numbers REALLY??
Can only guess. They are still back dating data even in January. Every week the past weeks data grows and grows. Huge backlog. I’ve seen estimates 4x to 10x the numbers put out in this week’s release.
Remember, this is only counting short term affects. Wait until the fall. That’s when we’ll see the true affects when the next covid seasonal cycle hits.
78% reduction by 2025 was the projection for the US
Well, if potentially, only 1% of cases are reported to VAERS, then add at least another zero to the end numbers in these stats, and you would probably have a more accurate count. 3,544 deaths becomes 35,440. 1 million+ adverse reactions becomes 10 Mil+.
I for one know of 12 in my extended family that didn't report any of the adverse reactions they suffered from with these vaccines. 1 took Pfizer's, 2 took J&J's, and 9 took Moderna's. And they ALL of experienced reactions from their "adverse reactions" lists. I told them to report them, and was ignored. Just like I was when telling them about these vaccines.
Wish theyd do some of the astra stats..
These asshats in the MSM are so concerned with death numbers all the time, and how high they are. Why aren't they speaking out more about these stats? Why Normies can't figure that part out is beyond me.
FTA: "The CDC follows up on any report of death" -- well, that leaves a lot of injury reports that may not be followed up, so we have no check on how serious they are in reality, only a report. As another anon mentioned days ago, it is possible anti-vaxxers could be submitting bogus reports. VAERS is a weak database, but at least it is getting attention.