Not true, not any more. If you search for that as a quote, it shows up in a newspaper from 1994. World population then was 5 billion something.
Population density of NYC says 27,000 per square mile, area of Texas is 268,597 square miles. The result there is 7,252,119,000. Current world population is 7.674 billion.
Imagine the sewage runoff from that. And the logistics and supply chain issues. "Could" doesn't mean "can", basically.
I'm not a fan of Georgia Guidestones etc etc but think about Africa with 4 billion people. China is at 1.3 billion and they're aggressively pushing for territory in other countries ( buying up things here also ). The situation should be managed better, overall, even if that means dictating policy to other countries, somehow, providing contraceptives as a condition of food shipments, whatever it is.
For what, instead of Texas in the quote, you mean? Doesn't change the amount of land needed for the food, or the mining, deforestation, other species going extinct, all that, to support the number of people?
It's really hard to get any stats or articles on this without running into all the globalist propaganda, but India's population is more out of control than China's right now,
the overpopulation hypothesis has been wrong many times. probably a rough time for that movie to come out lol
Yup. You could fit the entire world population in texas if they lived with the same population density of nyc.
Not true, not any more. If you search for that as a quote, it shows up in a newspaper from 1994. World population then was 5 billion something.
Population density of NYC says 27,000 per square mile, area of Texas is 268,597 square miles. The result there is 7,252,119,000. Current world population is 7.674 billion.
Imagine the sewage runoff from that. And the logistics and supply chain issues. "Could" doesn't mean "can", basically.
I'm not a fan of Georgia Guidestones etc etc but think about Africa with 4 billion people. China is at 1.3 billion and they're aggressively pushing for territory in other countries ( buying up things here also ). The situation should be managed better, overall, even if that means dictating policy to other countries, somehow, providing contraceptives as a condition of food shipments, whatever it is.
Alright so like india then
For what, instead of Texas in the quote, you mean? Doesn't change the amount of land needed for the food, or the mining, deforestation, other species going extinct, all that, to support the number of people?
It's really hard to get any stats or articles on this without running into all the globalist propaganda, but India's population is more out of control than China's right now,
https://ourworldindata.org/world-population-growth#population-growth-by-country
World population graph,
https://ourworldindata.org/uploads/2018/11/Annual-World-Population-since-10-thousand-BCE-for-OWID-800x498.png
Deer population graph, how things usually go when something breeds out of control and eats everything in sight,
http://www.uwyo.edu/dbmcd/popecol/janlects/Fig2.1deer.jpg
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23901632/
https://www.agweb.com/news/crops/crop-production/phosphorus-time-bomb-agriculture-myth-and-reality