These days whenever I see the word "harm" there's a reasonable chance that it's a part of some leftist/racist/globalist diatribe. Why? Because "harm" is a word that sounds bad but is ultimately vaguely defined. So they throw the word around and garner sympathy ("Who could be against harmful things?") without having to specify what exactly is "harmful".
These days whenever I see the word "harm" there's a reasonable chance that it's a part of some leftist/racist/globalist diatribe. Why? Because "harm" is a word that sounds bad but is ultimately vaguely defined. So they throw the word around and garner sympathy ("Who could be against harmful things?") without having to specify what exactly is "harmful".
Good observation