The baker won, but it went way up in the court system. Fortunately, he was able to continue to press, so I guess that is the angle I am bringing out. A lower court COULD rule in favor of freedom, and if the enemy stopped there, it would be done, at least for that district.
Another facet of this, if there is a religious reason to cover one's face, could it be argued there is a religious reason to NOT cover one's face, sighting the baker's ordeal, that an individual has religious freedom/freedom of conscience. Are states issuing ID's with faces covered by faith based garments? I have never seen one, just heard they were.
The baker won the case, though, so how does that logically compute?
The baker won, but it went way up in the court system. Fortunately, he was able to continue to press, so I guess that is the angle I am bringing out. A lower court COULD rule in favor of freedom, and if the enemy stopped there, it would be done, at least for that district.
Another facet of this, if there is a religious reason to cover one's face, could it be argued there is a religious reason to NOT cover one's face, sighting the baker's ordeal, that an individual has religious freedom/freedom of conscience. Are states issuing ID's with faces covered by faith based garments? I have never seen one, just heard they were.