If you want to force a red-pill on folks, do this. I made somebody's mind crack. Here a short transcript:
Them: "The election was not stolen."
Me: "Then what's the problem with an audit?"
Them: "When you have an audit looking for fraud, you'll find fraud."
Me: "If you allow mail in voting with very little means of identification, you invite the possibility of voter fraud. Voter ID mitigates that issue."
Them: "Voter ID is voter suppression. You are trying to block folks from voting."
Me: "Actually yes. I am trying to implement voter suppression. The suppression of people's ability to vote for others without their knowledge in order to tamper with an election."
Them: "What about the people who can't get ID? You are suppressing them!"
Me: "Anybody can go get an ID. Poor, Rich, ect. Anybody. If you can't get an ID, I suspect you probably have a reason why you can't, and it has nothing to do your financial status or living situation."
Them: (Mouth agape) "You're a racist/white-supremacist/ect/facist."
Me: "I am whatever you think of me if it leads to secure elections."
The mistake that many people do when debating a lib is bringing logics or facts to the fight. We both know those won't do a thing, they are religiously indoctrinated into their core beliefs.
Don't deny their accusations. That puts you on the backfoot and allows them to control the conversation. Don't say the election was stolen. Don't even mention fraud, just say possibility. Just state simple facts and agree with whatever they call you, and at best twist what they say into a way that supports your position.
What you are doing here is not attacking their core beliefs. That makes them more ardent especially when you don't want them to listen to you. Instead, you are muddying the waters. They need the fight. They see clearly during a fight because their training (AKA indoctrination) is stronger when adrenaline is going. But if you go path of least resistance, never allow the fight to escalate, it will allow their brains to actually absorb what you are saying.
Happy debating frens. :)
No, I'm a DevOps Cloud Engineer, and I suck at public speaking and debating in general.
I do have a knack for understanding how people think, and if I can keep the conversation from turning emotional, I can win out.