Catturd: Imagine a vaccine so popular - you have to have billions of dollars in campaign ads, celebrity endorsements, Big Tech and every politician in Washington D.C pushing it 24/7. And still end up with - The Great Awakening

Catturd: Imagine a vaccine so popular - you have to have billions of dollars in campaign ads, celebrity endorsements, Big Tech and every politician in Washington D.C pushing it 24/7. And still end up with (media.gab.com) ? B O O M ! ?

posted 3 years ago by undine53 (context) 3 years ago by undine53 +508 / -0

23 comments

23 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (23)

sorted by:

▲ 40 ▼

– ProudOfAmerica 40 points 3 years ago +41 / -1

I love the chart, but that curve will naturally happen as more people have already taken the vax.

(The percentage of remaining people who will not take it increases.)

permalink save report block reply

▲ 16 ▼

– interociter 16 points 3 years ago +16 / -0

Percentage of "not sure" and "would not" start off the same, and "would not" is more than twice the "not sure" number by the end. There's more going on there than just the eligible pool of people losing the ones who've taken the shot.

https://www.axios.com/vaccine-hesitancy-tipping-point-a41db61e-8736-4306-b415-2bfd81b8137a.html

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 12 ▼

– ProudOfAmerica 12 points 3 years ago +12 / -0

Very good point. It would appear that (as time goes on) a greater percentage of the unvaxxed are 'resolutely' unvaxxed as opposed to 'lazily' unvaxxed.

Word is getting out.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q