"A handheld portable phone was considered a gimmick, a "look what I got!" rich man's toy with dubious utility. Measuring 13 x 1.75 x 3.5 inches and weighing 28 ounces, the 8000X was so big and heavy, even its creators had nicknamed it "The Brick." Plus, you could only use it for a half an hour before the battery gave out. Who would pay a quarter of the average salary in 1984 — more than $9,000 in 2014 dollars — to carry around such a useless load, especially since payphones were everywhere and only cost a dime to use?"
From that exact article...
Also who says they couldn't have bought them that year (1984) and used them? Its a whole year of which is still considered 1984
JFMAMJJASOND
^ he has 9 months of the year still... not to mention the idea that a rich person could have got them before it was commercially available which is what the article is referring to
"A handheld portable phone was considered a gimmick, a "look what I got!" rich man's toy with dubious utility. Measuring 13 x 1.75 x 3.5 inches and weighing 28 ounces, the 8000X was so big and heavy, even its creators had nicknamed it "The Brick." Plus, you could only use it for a half an hour before the battery gave out. Who would pay a quarter of the average salary in 1984 — more than $9,000 in 2014 dollars — to carry around such a useless load, especially since payphones were everywhere and only cost a dime to use?"
From that exact article...
Also who says they couldn't have bought them that year (1984) and used them? Its a whole year of which is still considered 1984 JFMAMJJASOND ^ he has 9 months of the year still... not to mention the idea that a rich person could have got them before it was commercially available which is what the article is referring to
"Who would pay a quarter of the average salary in 1984 — more than $9,000 in 2014 dollars — to carry around such a useless load"
The same people that will stand in line for hours and pay $1000 when the latest and greatest cell phone comes out.
What's the point here?
You're trying to dispute the article you mentioned, on an entirely different point?