Scientific Peer-reviewed Studies and Clinical Reports can also be corrupt to sway people's opinions. You need to look at the study: was it balanced; how many participants; was the gold standard used?; what is the credibility of the scientists involved?

The New Nuremberg Trials 2021

A team of over 1,000 lawyers and over 10,000 medical experts led by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich have begun legal proceedings against the CDC, WHO & the Davos Group for crimes against humanity. Fuellmich and his team present the faulty PCR test and the order for doctors to label any comorbidity death as a Covid death as fraud. The PCR test was never designed to detect pathogens and is 100% faulty at 35 cycles. All the PCR tests overseen by the CDC are set at 37 to 45 cycles. The CDC admits that any tests over 28 cycles are not admissible for a positive reliable result. This alone invalidates over 90% of the alleged covid cases / ”infections” tracked by the use of this faulty test.

In addition to the flawed tests and fraudulent death certificates, the “experimental” vaccine itself is in violation of Article 32 of the Geneva Convention. Under Article 32 of the 1949 Geneva Convention IV, “mutilation and medical or scientific experiments not necessitated by the medical treatment of a protected person” are prohibited. According to Article 147, conducting biological experiments on protected persons is a grave breach of the Convention.

http://www.awaken-consciousness.com/blog/2021/05/05/the-new-nuremberg-trials-2021/

Scientific Facts and Clinical Trials can be corrupt also to sway the public.

This makes sense to me:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/wKYkq1cvYu4W/

https://www.bitchute.com/video/i2fMnrMH3Zm3/