The Ultimate red pill coming straight from Pfizer themselves
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (25)
sorted by:
https://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?IDNUMBER=1166062
Patient received second dose of Pfizer vaccine on March 17, 2021 while at work. March 18, 2021 her 5 month old breastfed infant developed a rash and within 24 hours was inconsolable, refusing to eat, and developed a fever. Patient brought baby to local ER where assessments were performed, blood analysis revealed elevated liver enzymes. Infant was hospitalized but continued to decline and passed away. Diagnosis of TTP. No known allergies. No new exposures aside from the mother''s vaccination the previous day.
Apr 22 2021: Video, "Nurse warns -- stay away from vaxxed people" https://www.bitchute.com/video/uNpRqMROrZQB/ Her web page with reports of bruising, allergic type reactions, women having unusual heavy bleeding with clotting, just from being in contact with the vaxxed -- http://www.truthunmasked.org/p/stay-away.html
April 22 2021: REPORT: Pfizer Vaccine Confirmed To Cause Neurodegenerative Diseases
https://nationalfile.com/report-pfizer-vaccine-confirmed-to-cause-neurodegenerative-diseases/
““In this paper the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine was evaluated for the potential to induce prion-based disease in vaccine recipients.” Prion-based diseases are, according to the CDC, a form of neurodegenerative diseases, meaning that the Pfizer vaccine is likely to cause long term damage and negative health effects with regards to the brain.” “This is especially concerning since the Pfizer vaccine is an mRNA vaccine, an untested type of vaccine which creates new proteins and can actually integrate into the human genome, according to a report from the National Library of Medicine. In other words, degenerative brain conditions may appear at any time in your life after receiving the vaccine.”
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33330870/
In support of this hypothesis, we found chimeric transcripts consisting of viral fused to cellular sequences in published data sets of SARS-CoV-2 infected cultured cells and primary cells of patients, consistent with the transcription of viral sequences integrated into the genome
Dr. Carrie Madej: “I see so many wrong things with this vaccine and I see that we are not talking about it in the major media and I see that I feel that these companies are outright lying to us when they say they cannot affect our DNA – because, by all definitions that they are using – this can affect our DNA.” It can change our Humanity: https://www.bitchute.com/video/PMJxyCCQzLKP/
Below is a link to an interview of a German Microbiologist. https://www.brighteon.com/37c00ecc-0d8d-4654-92c9-9f06155f3c7d
Private school in miami not allowing Vaccinations of teachers. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3CaTtP07o00&feature=youtu.be
April 2 2021: France quarentens vaccinated https://archive.ph/DsrxQ Source if you can speak french: https://archive.ph/tvs7S
First case: the vaccine or some of its constituents being in breast milk the day after the shot would not surprise me, but that is NOT "shedding". Its not even close to the same idea.
Second case: all those anecdotes are easily attributed to menstrual sympathy from a pheromone response.
Third case: Please read my post about this.
Fourth case: Dr. Carrie Madej: She is incorrect, at least in scope. mRNA has basically zero chance to be written to DNA. The adenovirus vaccines have at least a chance, but even then its very unlikely, and if it did happen (in either case) the most likely scenario is that that cell would be killed by the immune system since that's the function of the vaccines. Thus no hypothetically altered DNA would be passed on.
Any talk about these vaccines altering our DNA in any meaningful way is not based on biology. Is it misinformation (a lack of understanding of cell and molecular biology) or disinformation (purposeful fear mongering).
I think it is the first in most cases I have seen. Cell biology is very complicated, and you don't learn it to sufficient degree to be discussing it in detail from a medical school or pre-med program. As a general rule, unless someone is a specialist that requires that information (oncologist e.g.) or is also a researcher (MD PhD) they are not likely to have sufficient understanding about the specifics of cell or molecular biology, so please take what they say with a grain of salt.
How about this one. Apr 19, 2021: “Shedding Woo,” Clif High talking about some reports of problems that women are experiencing, and the long-term implications, https://www.bitchute.com/video/VJ4A4yu0veDA/ Long term anecdotal evidence of shedding issues.
There are reports of men sleeping next to their vaccinated partner waking up covered in bruises and not from a rough night. What might explain that reaction?
I really don't want to watch that whole video. He does not sound credible to me (though that is my first reaction to some things he said that weren't quite right, that is not a fair overall assessment since I didn't watch the whole thing).
Regardless, I still haven't seen anything that can't be attributed to pheromones. Men waking up with bruises? Whatever. That's not even an "anecdote" that's just a statement. Maybe the vaccine is causing people to be violent sleepers. Who knows. Maybe pheromones can cause such a thing. Maybe these are specific to the adenovirus vaccines (which I still am unlikely to think are "shedding", since they don't replicate, but at least its not completely implausible). Maybe a million things. Pick one that has a basis in biology, not "spike protein shedding" which doesn't.
Oh, and evidence is better than speculation. I still haven't seen any evidence of anything other than menstrual sympathy.