Because the title says these sources are about the negative effects of 5g. Posting sources that do not directly support your claim lowers your credibility.
Where did I say anything about normies? I said your credibility suffers when you post sources that don't support your claim. I randomly clicked around on your links 3 times and got a few things: A study about low frequency (not 5G), a study about living near power lines (not 5G), and a study that concluded that the risk of ALS could not be determined, and then continue to provide its opinion that 5G has not been shown to cause other health problems.
Maybe 5G is risky, but you aren't demonstrating that. I'm trying to help you clean up so that you can have some credibility about this, but you're being hysterical... kind of like a golem when they hear truth they don't want to accept.
Because the title says these sources are about the negative effects of 5g. Posting sources that do not directly support your claim lowers your credibility.
So you're a liar? It's clear you didn't check my post history.
Where did I say anything about normies? I said your credibility suffers when you post sources that don't support your claim. I randomly clicked around on your links 3 times and got a few things: A study about low frequency (not 5G), a study about living near power lines (not 5G), and a study that concluded that the risk of ALS could not be determined, and then continue to provide its opinion that 5G has not been shown to cause other health problems.
Maybe 5G is risky, but you aren't demonstrating that. I'm trying to help you clean up so that you can have some credibility about this, but you're being hysterical... kind of like a golem when they hear truth they don't want to accept.
Okay. I randomly chose the second from last one. It's also not about 5G. How many times do I have to click before you get it?