Is a study in the effects of phone USAGE (how much time did someone receive and send messages and read, play games etc.) and no study was done about the effect of EM.
If you want anyone to look into 5G, send them only relevant studies, because they will dismiss all of it just based on looking at one publication alone.
I was talking to a special kind of normie on damn tiktok that was saying we are a danger to society because we do not wear masks and not getting vaccinated and said we needed "vaccine passports."
Because the title says these sources are about the negative effects of 5g. Posting sources that do not directly support your claim lowers your credibility.
I'm going through them all. It is very useful.
However, the first link is a publication about extremely low EMF (0-3000 Hz) and not 5G (which is extremely high frequency...).
https://web.archive.org/save/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3042390/pdf/1471-2458-11-66.pdf
Is a study in the effects of phone USAGE (how much time did someone receive and send messages and read, play games etc.) and no study was done about the effect of EM.
If you want anyone to look into 5G, send them only relevant studies, because they will dismiss all of it just based on looking at one publication alone.
I was talking to a special kind of normie on damn tiktok that was saying we are a danger to society because we do not wear masks and not getting vaccinated and said we needed "vaccine passports."
SMFH...
Because the title says these sources are about the negative effects of 5g. Posting sources that do not directly support your claim lowers your credibility.
So you're a liar? It's clear you didn't check my post history.
Okay. I randomly chose the second from last one. It's also not about 5G. How many times do I have to click before you get it?