Early in the scamdemic, I tried to contact medical doctors to ask if the following procedure could be a way to immunize against covid: Withdraw some blood from a person, inoculate it with a few covid "cells", let the person's immune system (at least what is in blood) develop antibodies to it, kill off the virus in the blood sample, then inject it back into the person, where they would have antibodies ready if needed in the future. I got no response from about 3 or 4 attempts (contacting medical research facilities). Now, I'm thinking, what would happen if just 2 or 3 covid "cells" were injected into a person? Since it is a respiratory virus, wouldn't it easily be taken care of when in the blood, resulting in antibodies that could fight it if it ever was introduced into the respiratory system? I hope someone here has some expertise/insight on this idea.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (32)
sorted by:
There's no such thing as viruses, antibodies or immune systems --- as presently understood.
There's nothing to be "immune" to in the first place.
Germ theory is a giant hoax, from beginning to end.
The truth is always simple and self-evident.
I'm not a scientist, but this^ makes the most sense after being around kids and animals...some of the dirtiest little boys never get sick, they play outside and roll around with dogs & other kids, they're just tough.
but the ones who are coddled by their mothers, and not allowed to play, have all kinds of 'issues'. mind over matter.
Let them eat dirt! It does strengthen the immune system. To say there is no immune system I think is a bit of a stretch. I have worked with the effects of dysfunctional immune systems for years. To say that everything is simply a matter of toxicity is not understanding the complexities of how our immune system is orchestrated and functions.
Terrain theory has a few holes in it I cannot get past and those difficulties have yet to be explained to me to my satisfaction. But I do keep an open mind. That is the scientific method. Science must always be challenged. Once a position becomes entrenched and fixed it becomes dogmatic. That is not science, but religion.
We were designed to have a healthy immune response by coming into contact with things that stimulate it. Generations of children have been permanently damaged by targeting the immune system with poison. The very thing they claim is for our good is what is killing people - along with poisoned food, air, and water.
Shingles in adults skyrocketed at the very same time that children started to be immunized against chicken pox - a nuisance disease. So then, big pharma gets to roll out another shot - for shingles. We lost our natural immune boosters against shingles when the children around us no longer got chicken pox. As long as our immune system was periodically challenged by coming into contact with chicken pox, it kept the virus in check and stuck in the nerve ganglions. I am sorry, terrain theory cannot explain that correlation.
I do think we need to rethink the science behind viruses though. In that respect I lean more towards terrain theory. But, I am not ready to throw out germ theory all together. Bacterial infections can kill you and antibiotics can and do save lives; however, it has come with a cost - microbial resistance. I think the truth really does lie somewhere in the middle.