Early in the scamdemic, I tried to contact medical doctors to ask if the following procedure could be a way to immunize against covid: Withdraw some blood from a person, inoculate it with a few covid "cells", let the person's immune system (at least what is in blood) develop antibodies to it, kill off the virus in the blood sample, then inject it back into the person, where they would have antibodies ready if needed in the future. I got no response from about 3 or 4 attempts (contacting medical research facilities). Now, I'm thinking, what would happen if just 2 or 3 covid "cells" were injected into a person? Since it is a respiratory virus, wouldn't it easily be taken care of when in the blood, resulting in antibodies that could fight it if it ever was introduced into the respiratory system? I hope someone here has some expertise/insight on this idea.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (32)
sorted by:
Thank you for the inquiry. At least you are attempting to use that brain you were given in order to try to solve problems - something too few are able to do nowadays. I will try to answer your questions the best I can.
To put it simply, our innate immune response to respiratory pathogens takes place naturally in the lung tissue because this is the point of entry. There is a non specific immune response always on the ready to take care of invaders and takes place in the tissue. A localized response is mounted while at the same time modulating that response as to not interfere with critical lung function. As an infection increases, more and more resources are deployed to fight that infection and clean up the damage and waste by way of chemical messaging.
What you speak of relates to adaptive specific immune responses that also take place more locally in the lung tissue. Your inquiry is related to B-cell adaptive immune capabilities that result in specific antibody production against a specific pathogen. B-cells are developed in the bone marrow and then migrate to the spleen and lymph nodes. This is where they become activated in response to antigens. In the case of respiratory infections this takes place locally in the lungs and its associated lymphatic tissue. (This is why cancer is located first in localized lymph nodes before it metastasizes.)
Targeting a specific B-cell by giving an antigen in the blood that causes activation throughout the entire body versus a more natural localized activation, like in the case of respiratory infection, is like trying to kill a gnat with a sledge hammer. The gnat may still get away but the furniture gets destroyed - in the entire house. And all of this destruction takes place before the gnat even shows up - but the hammer stays ready.
There are many more cells and immune modulating molecules involved than just B-cells or antibodies. Just the same as an army does not go to war using only a single type of strategy or weapon, our immune system uses a variety of defensive and offensive mechanisms to fight infection. Because the immune response in respiratory infections is not completely understood and is complicated, we have been limited as to the success of preventatives such as vaccines. It is just not that simple even though they try to make it sound that way.
Having a antibody produced by B-cells using antigen presentation thru viral vaccines prior to organic infection, is basically in theory only a time saver with regard to the production of those specific antibodies. Because those antibodies arrive sooner, the severity of the infection is lessened - sometimes to the point of not feeling ill at all - providing that the rest of the immune system is functioning properly as well. This is why vaccines against respiratory viral infections generally only work to lessen symptoms. They are limited as to preventing infection and most certainly do not prevent transmission. Sound familiar?
As in the case with influenza, a person's own immune capability will be the determining factor as to whether they can successfully mount a challenge to infection. IMHO attempts to meddle with this ballet called our immune response to viral infections, most of which are more a nuisance than deadly for the immune healthy, have caused far more harm than any perceived good. Our bodies are being forced to utilize finite resources to mount a generalized response that was meant to be taken care of locally. Can you say autoimmune disease?
When we start thinking about this whole plandemic in terms of an eugenicist bioweapon instead of an organic viral infection, we will go much further in protecting ourselves against what the globalist agenda is trying to unleash upon us. I hope this helps.
Thank you! The autoimmune possibilities with these "vaccines" is what really concerns me. I couldn't talk my 20-something daughters out of getting the shot, and I think they did. I believe my son is aware enough not to get the shot. My wife and I will wait a few years to see how it all plays out.
You are welcome. The real test is going to be this fall to see whether pathogenic priming is going to make those that have received the jab really sick when their immune systems overreact to any coronavirus. This is what happened during the Spanish Flu epidemic in 1918. Most of those young healthy adults died because of an experimental vaccine and overdosing on aspirin when they did get sick. History repeating itself. I knew a lady years ago that lost her first husband in that epidemic. The grandfather of my best friend in HS also died - her father was only two when his father died in the pandemic.
Even influenza has the potential to trigger an already overexcited immune system. Those that manage to be talked into getting an influenza vaccine in addition to all this COVID insanity are really going to be in trouble. A huge VA study showed that influenza vaccines made infection with coronaviruses more likely. How many nursing home patients had been vaccinated for influenza and died with the first wave with whatever the hell was released? Those poor people were murdered.
But, the plandemic did not kill as many as they wanted and petered out faster than they had planned. So, they had to continue to hype the numbers to keep the scam going until they could roll the jabs out. They already had them in the pipeline but for optics they had to at least wait a couple of months.
The other issue is a reproductive one. We will not know for sure whether birth rates have been affected for at least 18 to 24 months from now. Feedback I am getting from the OBs is that miscarriages are up - dramatically. I know someone who's next door neighbor just lost her baby. The day she got the second jab was the day they found out the baby did not have a heartbeat. She delivered that dead baby this Tuesday. I am assuming that the rouge proteins attacked the placenta. Clotting could cut off the blood supply to the baby. We are also seeing some of the reproductive issues in those not jabbed. This is concerning.
No one knows for sure what the hell is in these jabs because we are not being told. I heard from one doc that when she looked at the package insert from one of the jabs all she found was a blank page. This is insane. Unfortunately for us, we do not have access to high end sophisticated laboratory equipment to analyze what exactly is in these things. What we have found so far is disturbing to say the least.
The VAERS reporting system is already at 3500 deaths. So if you consider that only about 1% of all adverse reactions are reported... well, you do the math. Also, some of the reporting appears to be delayed by several months. Never have this many people been injured with the rollout of a product and the product continue to be pushed out. Several pharmaceutical products have been halted with just 50 people or less being killed in the past - so what gives? This is pure evil and a large swath of the public is under the false assumption that if there is a problem that the jabs would be pulled. Their ignorance could cost them their lives.
The same symptomology labeled as COVID is related to adverse reactions we are noting with the jabs. So, there more than likely is a similar mechanism of action - or several similar mechanisms of action all in play at the same time. Remember hearing about COVID toes? Autopsies that managed to leak out reported micro-clotting all over the body. Everyone was so focused on the acute respiratory infection that the clotting issues were taking a back seat. Whatever the causative factors were that elicited the initial manifestation of COVID, we are seeing some of the same symptoms along with others that could be related to the same underlying mechanisms. We just don't know.
All I know is that something is happening that cannot be laid at the door of mass hysteria. Which by the way, the CDC is now saying that some of the adverse reactions are due to anxiety. I am sure that is very comforting to know for those that have been injured or for those related to someone that died. Right on schedule. They can no longer deny something is happening to people after they get jabbed, so this is their excuse. They will run with that until they have to come up with something new to explain all the injury and death - like when people start dropping this fall. Take care of yourself.