Just because someone is saying what your fears want to hear, doesn't make it true.
In this case the author (some completely random non-scientist on the internet) is taking some facts, and falsely (without evidence) associating them. For example, just because self-spreading vaccines are an area of research doesn't in ANY WAY mean the current round of CV vaccines are these technologies. Indeed, there is no biological basis by which the mRNA vaccines can perform such a task, and not one person has brought forth actual evidence, nor a biologically sound path by which it can happen.
Citing "experts" is no better in the way it is being done; selectively "proving" the author's desires with their "transcripts" (which are actually the authors summaries, i.e. belief of meaning).
Many of the things being presented by the doctors are evidence, some are speculation. Some are straight up a person speaking outside of their scope of understanding.
For example, Dr. Madej speaks of "hydrogels" and talks about all these things that hydrogels do, blah, blah. The vaccines are not hydrogels. There are no hydrogel in ANY of the vaccines. Also, "hydrogel" is a very broad term. They can be made of many substances, and can have many applications, generally on scales much larger than the lipid nanoparticles. Her making direct connections between completely different applications of completely different hydrogels is completely incorrect, even IF a certain type were part of the vaccines. It would be like me saying that a child's tricycle causes air traffic problems because both tricycle and an airplane are vehicles with wheels. In other words, everything she says about "hydrogels" is a categorical error.
Her attempting to make connections between 5G and the spike proteins are an even worse misunderstanding of the physics of photonic interactions with molecules. She does well on the biology, but once she leaves that sphere she is no longer an expert, but a regular person without education or experience in the field.
Just because someone has M.D. after their name does not make them an expert in bio-nanotechnology (the area of study of these vaccines) nor cell biology (the area of study of the effect of these vaccines). It most certainly does not remove the fallibility of people in general, nor does it remove the ability for people to purposefully spread disinformation. That doesn't mean these M.D.'s aren't worth listening to, they are (and some are better than others), but it is important to keep in mind they are not providing the gospel. Further investigation is ALWAYS warranted, and our beliefs should always be mutable if truth is our desired result.
If you allow fear to guide your beliefs, you get the view of reality that the Luciferians want you to have. That is their game.
Stop believing crap just because you want it to be true.
Just because someone is saying what your fears want to hear, doesn't make it true.
In this case the author (some completely random non-scientist on the internet) is taking some facts, and falsely (without evidence) associating them. For example, just because self-spreading vaccines are an area of research doesn't in ANY WAY mean the current round of CV vaccines are these technologies. Indeed, there is no biological basis by which the mRNA vaccines can perform such a task, and not one person has brought forth actual evidence, nor a biologically sound path by which it can happen.
Citing "experts" is no better in the way it is being done; selectively "proving" the author's desires with their "transcripts" (which are actually the authors summaries, i.e. belief of meaning).
Many of the things being presented by the doctors are evidence, some are speculation. Some are straight up a person speaking outside of their scope of understanding.
For example, Dr. Madej speaks of "hydrogels" and talks about all these things that hydrogels do, blah, blah. The vaccines are not hydrogels. There are no hydrogel in ANY of the vaccines. Also, "hydrogel" is a very broad term. They can be made of many substances, and can have many applications, generally on scales much larger than the lipid nanoparticles. Her making direct connections between completely different applications of completely different hydrogels is completely incorrect, even IF a certain type were part of the vaccines. It would be like me saying that a child's tricycle causes air traffic problems because both tricycle and an airplane are vehicles with wheels. In other words, everything she says about "hydrogels" is a categorical error.
Her attempting to make connections between 5G and the spike proteins are an even worse misunderstanding of the physics of photonic interactions with molecules. She does well on the biology, but once she leaves that sphere she is no longer an expert, but a regular person without education or experience in the field.
Just because someone has M.D. after their name does not make them an expert in bio-nanotechnology (the area of study of these vaccines) nor cell biology (the area of study of the effect of these vaccines). It most certainly does not remove the fallibility of people in general, nor does it remove the ability for people to purposefully spread disinformation. That doesn't mean these M.D.'s aren't worth listening to, they are (and some are better than others), but it is important to keep in mind they are not providing the gospel. Further investigation is ALWAYS warranted, and our beliefs should always be mutable if truth is our desired result.
If you allow fear to guide your beliefs, you get the view of reality that the Luciferians want you to have. That is their game.
Stop believing crap just because you want it to be true.