He wasn't. The kids were swearing and cussing and being loud and unruly in that hotel outdoors, where this guy and his family and others were having dinner, disturbing them. The guy told them to quiet down, then the dress kid started harassing and yelling at the polo shirt guy, same with the guy filming who was the boyfriend of the dress kid.
Even if he was following them, he wasn't harassing, seemed like he did the Nick Sandmann thing and just smiled at them.
There is no earlier video, unfortunately. This is all there is. We only have the word of the gay boyfriend filming and all the other observers. The observers all tell the same story, that the kids were unruly and rude and the polo guy didn't do anything to them. The gay boyfriend is the only one with a different story. It's clear who's lying in this scenario.
Why was he following kids around to harass them? Seems like a pretty bad decision.
He wasn't. The kids were swearing and cussing and being loud and unruly in that hotel outdoors, where this guy and his family and others were having dinner, disturbing them. The guy told them to quiet down, then the dress kid started harassing and yelling at the polo shirt guy, same with the guy filming who was the boyfriend of the dress kid.
Even if he was following them, he wasn't harassing, seemed like he did the Nick Sandmann thing and just smiled at them.
Ah. The video doesn't really provide that context. Just looks like he's following the kid around to provoke him. Where's the whole the story?
There is no earlier video, unfortunately. This is all there is. We only have the word of the gay boyfriend filming and all the other observers. The observers all tell the same story, that the kids were unruly and rude and the polo guy didn't do anything to them. The gay boyfriend is the only one with a different story. It's clear who's lying in this scenario.
Gotcha. Context is always useful.