Lmao. Only Q people would call this "very high quality." Perhaps a lot of good information here but this is an awful infographic. Who the hell would ever read this? Information overload. Infographics are about boiling things down to the most essential elements and presenting them in an aesthetic and digestible way. This is the opposite of that.
LOL, downvoted. The generalization is kinda stupid: "only Q people would call this "very high quality"
I'm confident there are PLENTY of other people out there who have never even heard of Q (or know any actual facts about Q) who would get enthused about any similar collection of data in an area they are interested in and call it 'very high quality'. Seriously. You seem to think that "Q people" are basically idiots, and every other single group or collective of humans on the planet are essentially different? Dude, seriously?
You DO make an important point: that the visual presentation of the info - the graphic' part of infographic - is actually not that good. Moreover, your point about what a good infographic should do is well stated.
Too bad your positive contribution was smushed because of your poor choice of words or your rather myopic step of making what appears to be a derogatory generalization about "Q people".
In other words, not a VERY HIGH QUALITY comment. It kind of trips over its own shoelaces.
Can I suggest you work on that? I actually love your contribution about the nature of effective infographics, but your presentation is kinda crap.
Lmao. Only Q people would call this "very high quality." Perhaps a lot of good information here but this is an awful infographic. Who the hell would ever read this? Information overload. Infographics are about boiling things down to the most essential elements and presenting them in an aesthetic and digestible way. This is the opposite of that.
LOL, downvoted. The generalization is kinda stupid: "only Q people would call this "very high quality"
I'm confident there are PLENTY of other people out there who have never even heard of Q (or know any actual facts about Q) who would get enthused about any similar collection of data in an area they are interested in and call it 'very high quality'. Seriously. You seem to think that "Q people" are basically idiots, and every other single group or collective of humans on the planet are essentially different? Dude, seriously?
You DO make an important point: that the visual presentation of the info - the graphic' part of infographic - is actually not that good. Moreover, your point about what a good infographic should do is well stated.
Too bad your positive contribution was smushed because of your poor choice of words or your rather myopic step of making what appears to be a derogatory generalization about "Q people".
In other words, not a VERY HIGH QUALITY comment. It kind of trips over its own shoelaces.
Can I suggest you work on that? I actually love your contribution about the nature of effective infographics, but your presentation is kinda crap.
Just saying.
Thanks I thought I was the only one lol. This graphic is not helpful at all for the common person.