He says that chapter XI applies because DC is a territory, but he says its not a foreign territory. I think he is incorrect in that. I think it applies precisely because it is a foreign territory. I can't prove that , but I have seen enough evidence (through corporate chain of ownership) that I think it is likely true.
I agree, The key dates in our history points to this because of the Civil War bankruptcy: 1868, 1870 and of course the Act of 1871. The PTB obfuscated the ownership by simple word change of "These United States" to "The United States"
on the Constitutions heading and making the country and citizens collateral..
It's a foreign territory because it is presided over by a foreign government. A corporation that provides governing service, while also being registered to the Crown of England/City of London.
Yes, that's the theory. I've seen evidence that points in that direction, but I haven't seen enough evidence that I could point someone else there and have them say "yes, this is the truth." At best what I've seen would more likely make them say, "it seems possible."
But, I don't know that this is sufficient, because it doesn't really show a direct and provable connection between all these laws and corporations and the laws and government we currently use as our federal government. Nor does it show a dissolution or bankruptcy of the US Corp as has been suggested.
There is good evidence, but there are still holes that need to be filled.
If you have other good evidence to support your claim I would love to see it.
The fact that the United States is a corporation that is registered to the crown doesn't give you any idea as to what is going on? Justinian's c'est e que trust, and subsequent papal bull asserting the total dominion of the Vatican over the earth and it's inhabitants? That fiat money and debt based banking is leveraged with the American citizens as collateral? The "trading with the enemies act?"
The fact that the UCC governs the millions of statutes that have been created while ignoring the Constitution?
I am well aware of the theories behind all of your (I guess?) Socratic episodes. I even have good evidence to support them. I was looking for more evidence because what I have is not enough to prove it in a court of law. And that is what I want. Really hard, gritty, in your face, evidence.
He says that chapter XI applies because DC is a territory, but he says its not a foreign territory. I think he is incorrect in that. I think it applies precisely because it is a foreign territory. I can't prove that , but I have seen enough evidence (through corporate chain of ownership) that I think it is likely true.
I agree, The key dates in our history points to this because of the Civil War bankruptcy: 1868, 1870 and of course the Act of 1871. The PTB obfuscated the ownership by simple word change of "These United States" to "The United States" on the Constitutions heading and making the country and citizens collateral..
It's a foreign territory because it is presided over by a foreign government. A corporation that provides governing service, while also being registered to the Crown of England/City of London.
Yes, that's the theory. I've seen evidence that points in that direction, but I haven't seen enough evidence that I could point someone else there and have them say "yes, this is the truth." At best what I've seen would more likely make them say, "it seems possible."
For example this gives a really good exploration and explanation of the laws surrounding the Act of 1871, its refinement in 1878, and the incorporation of the United States Corporation Company.
And this gives a really good layout of the corporate connections between US Corp. and the London Banks.
But, I don't know that this is sufficient, because it doesn't really show a direct and provable connection between all these laws and corporations and the laws and government we currently use as our federal government. Nor does it show a dissolution or bankruptcy of the US Corp as has been suggested.
There is good evidence, but there are still holes that need to be filled.
If you have other good evidence to support your claim I would love to see it.
The fact that the United States is a corporation that is registered to the crown doesn't give you any idea as to what is going on? Justinian's c'est e que trust, and subsequent papal bull asserting the total dominion of the Vatican over the earth and it's inhabitants? That fiat money and debt based banking is leveraged with the American citizens as collateral? The "trading with the enemies act?"
The fact that the UCC governs the millions of statutes that have been created while ignoring the Constitution?
I asked for evidence and you give me questions?
I am well aware of the theories behind all of your (I guess?) Socratic episodes. I even have good evidence to support them. I was looking for more evidence because what I have is not enough to prove it in a court of law. And that is what I want. Really hard, gritty, in your face, evidence.