Of course maps show a flat earth, paper is flat. Draw the map on something stretchy and wrap it round a sphere - now the "earth" is a ball - it is the same map.
A flat earth would have daylight everywhere when the sun rises, but you can call people on the other side of the planet, and they will tell you: its dark here.
Flat earth is there to discredit some of the other things that are true, such as there being many "ages" on this planet. Periodically there is a cataclysm that kills almost everyone and scours the surface with tsunamis and buries everything under miles of mud. The cataclysm is probably a "skin shift", or crust displacement, which would look like a magnetic pole shift, in the same way as a bullet path looks like a curve, although it is straight within an absolute frame of reference without gravity.
Sunlight would be everywhere if the only thing that would change in a flat earth is the earth just being flat. Flat earth carries with it a series of pathways? layers? in which plasmic or celestial bodies travel around the world and are not the size the sun is in the heliocentric model. Again, you are denying flat earth by presupposing the heliocentric model as being true.
How and why did ancient or far past civilizations figure out the sundial? If it was daylight everywhere then sundials would not work. They knew the earth was a sphere, millennia ago? How are the planets and other bodies represented in ancient Sumerian carvings? Scientists have postulated that the atmosphere was different even a few millenia ago (why Saturn was worshipped as the "black sun" because it would have been visible). How does the moon perform a total equinox why would it orbit the earth, and the earth orbit the sun, exactly on an axis to allow conditions for total eclipse often throughout history?
The original crash, outward, of water would have literally seperated the waters above and below and created the firmament. The cataclysms also coincide with the star alignments. Why do we see the same stars if we are careening through space?
The pole shift may be the excuse, and it definitely relates to the cataclysmic cycle where something is ripped - but remove presupposition and the question of why these things occur becomes very interesting.
It's just, from years of studying philosophy, religion, history, etc combined with FOIA vault declas and the notion that we have been lied to, about a lot of things, it seems plausible. I don't want and never did want to think that, but it's becoming harder to ignore.
Of course maps show a flat earth, paper is flat. Draw the map on something stretchy and wrap it round a sphere - now the "earth" is a ball - it is the same map.
A flat earth would have daylight everywhere when the sun rises, but you can call people on the other side of the planet, and they will tell you: its dark here.
Flat earth is there to discredit some of the other things that are true, such as there being many "ages" on this planet. Periodically there is a cataclysm that kills almost everyone and scours the surface with tsunamis and buries everything under miles of mud. The cataclysm is probably a "skin shift", or crust displacement, which would look like a magnetic pole shift, in the same way as a bullet path looks like a curve, although it is straight within an absolute frame of reference without gravity.
Sunlight would be everywhere if the only thing that would change in a flat earth is the earth just being flat. Flat earth carries with it a series of pathways? layers? in which plasmic or celestial bodies travel around the world and are not the size the sun is in the heliocentric model. Again, you are denying flat earth by presupposing the heliocentric model as being true.
How and why did ancient or far past civilizations figure out the sundial? If it was daylight everywhere then sundials would not work. They knew the earth was a sphere, millennia ago? How are the planets and other bodies represented in ancient Sumerian carvings? Scientists have postulated that the atmosphere was different even a few millenia ago (why Saturn was worshipped as the "black sun" because it would have been visible). How does the moon perform a total equinox why would it orbit the earth, and the earth orbit the sun, exactly on an axis to allow conditions for total eclipse often throughout history?
The original crash, outward, of water would have literally seperated the waters above and below and created the firmament. The cataclysms also coincide with the star alignments. Why do we see the same stars if we are careening through space?
The pole shift may be the excuse, and it definitely relates to the cataclysmic cycle where something is ripped - but remove presupposition and the question of why these things occur becomes very interesting.
It's just, from years of studying philosophy, religion, history, etc combined with FOIA vault declas and the notion that we have been lied to, about a lot of things, it seems plausible. I don't want and never did want to think that, but it's becoming harder to ignore.