Hope this is allowed! I've browsed on this site for a while, even had another username where I engaged in some fairly civil debates with other users before I was banned due to not being a Q follower.
Interested in having a friendly discussion with anyone who's up for it!
A bit about me:
I'm a mechanical engineer working in product marketing I live in a major city, Chicago, and have pretty much only voted democrat I am a homeowner I have followed conspiracies for a while based solely on my own curiosity, and by and large found that a lot of the major ones (pizzagate, Q) don't make a ton of sense, but I'm not here to argue that. I think we're just gonna have different opinions on it.
All said, happy to have a casual AMA! Not interested in flamebaiting or arguing
Oh, no it wouldn't be hard to replicate. I think the way it was displayed was laughable. Marking age vs number of people with a line graph is silly. I'd be happy to explain it with a video or something if you'd be interested in watching it.
10+ years experience as an engineer, if we're just talking professionally.
Do it then. I'd love for you to show you are smarter than a world renowned physicist. Video and all. Explain where he is wrong.
http://www.toolsforanalysis.com/douglas.html
So, essentially the big part of his point is his graphs that show weird curves, but the X and Y axis data points are measured as age of population (X axis) and number of people who voted (Y axis).
Take a given age, say 30, and you have a datapoint of how many people voted who were of that age, say a thousand. Well, logistically that should be represented as a single point, or a bar on a bar graph. As you get different ages, you have single, fixed points.
Now, this guy seems to have not only connected them with the line, but also appears to have normalized the trend a bit so the curve is smooth. This isn't his representation of the 6th order polynomial curve (which is, again, just gibberish. The words he said don't mean anything) but this is supposedly the hard data from the voting results.
Representing that with a curve and then utilizing this to compare to another curve of ages and voter turnout makes no sense, because by connecting the points and normalizing the trendline the data becomes skewed.
I hope this makes sense, I didn't make a video because I was out with pals last night, but I still wanted to get this description in.
Does he have the raw data that he used? Because if I could see that and make my own graph it'd be INCREDIBLY useful
Ask him. He's exceptionally transparent and will provide with where to get that data. He responds to his Facebook messenger often. Tell him your sceptical of the data and he will set you straight.
Oh I'm not on facebook anymore. Got tired of the bullshit long ago. I thought people on this site were too?
Yes, I understand the dataset, but his chart is what I do not. He graphed it in a way that's misleading and confusing, but talks as if it's not. If he's a renowned physicist and has excelled in other things, great! I'm not doubting that. But what he displayed on Mike Lindell's video made very little sense, mathematically and logistically
Yes, it is though. I watched the entire video, but I appreciate your concern. His descriptions were also, primarily, nonsense.
You know what's funny, I bet your image of me and who I am and what I'm about is pretty funny and interesting, but I'm willing to bet if we met in person you'd be very surprised by how normal I am!
Still waiting on that video. Such a fraud you are.
Hah no worries! I haven't had time to make it. Been a busy week and I'm also getting ready to move into my new house. I'll let you know when I put it together!