Hope this is allowed! I've browsed on this site for a while, even had another username where I engaged in some fairly civil debates with other users before I was banned due to not being a Q follower.
Interested in having a friendly discussion with anyone who's up for it!
A bit about me:
I'm a mechanical engineer working in product marketing I live in a major city, Chicago, and have pretty much only voted democrat I am a homeowner I have followed conspiracies for a while based solely on my own curiosity, and by and large found that a lot of the major ones (pizzagate, Q) don't make a ton of sense, but I'm not here to argue that. I think we're just gonna have different opinions on it.
All said, happy to have a casual AMA! Not interested in flamebaiting or arguing
Sure! let me know if this link works for you:
https://www.ft.com/content/e1454ace-e61b-11e9-9743-db5a370481bc
To my second point, I'm not saying that Burisma was ALREADY under investigation, I'm saying that the investigation was on crimes and allegations that took place before Hunter Biden was put on the board.
Basically, what it means is Hunter Biden was on the board in 2015, but the investigation was on things that took place in 2010-2012, so Hunter's actions wouldn't have any affect on these investigations since the events under question Biden had no involvement with.
I accidentally overlooked this in the initial foray of data that I sent you... Oh no, is that his accountant encouraging him to evade taxes from his payments from Burisma?? Weird...
https://patriots.win/p/11QRyKfhQ9/hunter-email-receiving-payouts-f/c/
And this one... dripping down the pipeline... Oh no! Is that Burisma admitting to bribery?! Uh oh...
https://archive.fo/mFmfR
What's the source of that first email, btw?
The second article appears to be twisting the words of the statement that was made. They refuted the sum, but does that mean they must have bribed the Biden's still?
The source of the first email is Hunter's email dump, which has, unfortunately, been wiped from the internet. Nothing like freedom of information...
Yes, you are on the right track... they refuted how much they paid, which is a semi-admission that the context is correct.
So how were you able to confirm the first email is from Hunter's laptop and not, say, written by just someone else in their basement?
I don't see how it's concrete proof, using implied language. You'd need better evidence than that.
It appears that we are having two different discussions.
I am giving you links to proofs of the BIDENS doing naughty things... Regardless of what was reported as being investigated, I am referring to the very real blackmail and laundering scheme undertaken by the Bidens against Ukraine via Burisma in the time frame from Biden being VP.
So, if you can refute the points that I am arguing, that would be fun!
And, again, your links regarding removing the prosecutor, while they do say those words, the people asking for his removal aren't persuasive. They are cranky lobbiests who didn't get their way who want favorable treatment that this prosecutor isn't providing. And they shouldn't, right? They are the nation's prosecutor, so if something isn't done correctly, shouldn't they object?
Right and I'm giving you links to prove they aren't involved. Because the Biden's weren't affiliated with Burisma during the period that naughty things happened.
Yes, I absolutely appreciate the argument that you are making. And my point is that naughty things were happening during the Biden period as well, but that they are are trying to obfuscate the issue... ((only naughty things were happening at this point in time, please pay no attention to the man behind the curtain))
Burisma is just a BIG naughty thing. The naughtiest of naughties.
Why does Pelosi's son also have interest in a Ukraine O/G company??
So, which direction does the corruption run? Does it run from Ukraine to the Bidens and/or the Pelosis? Or does it run from the other direction? Who is twisting whose arm? The information at this point is leading to the corruption running from the Bidens TO Ukraine.
The problem seems to be that the prosecutor was ousted because of his investigations, however his investigations had nothing to do with the time period where the Biden's were involved.
So, these two facts don't line up