Hope this is allowed! I've browsed on this site for a while, even had another username where I engaged in some fairly civil debates with other users before I was banned due to not being a Q follower.
Interested in having a friendly discussion with anyone who's up for it!
A bit about me:
I'm a mechanical engineer working in product marketing I live in a major city, Chicago, and have pretty much only voted democrat I am a homeowner I have followed conspiracies for a while based solely on my own curiosity, and by and large found that a lot of the major ones (pizzagate, Q) don't make a ton of sense, but I'm not here to argue that. I think we're just gonna have different opinions on it.
All said, happy to have a casual AMA! Not interested in flamebaiting or arguing
Well, specifically I'm looking for a fact that ties the prosecutor directly to an investigation into Biden. I understand that you are drawing these conclusions, but it doesn't appear any rule of law is, considering that, again, the investigation that the prosecutor was apart of did not involve the Bidens at all. It taking place during Joe's last time in the white house doesn't really prove anything, since, again, he wasn't directly involved with Burisma at that time.
Correction: the point I am making is not only that other people had been demanding his resignation years before, but also that he was investigating actions that the Bidens weren't even part of.
So I see this video referenced a lot. Biden said, quote "I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money. Well, son of a bitch. (Laughter.) He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time."
Now, I understand that you're taking that statement as fact, but if you do your research, you may find that the way Biden tells it is actually not exactly the timeline. Are you aware of that? Because if not, it may change your perspective a bit.
And yet, again, you are focusing on a fact that is not relevant to the argument.
I'm sorry that you were never taught how to do actual research or to use critical thinking skills. We demand higher abilities here.
Good luck. I now understand exactly why you are a Biden voter.
Are you aware that Biden's statement that you are using to prove his corruption is not an actual illustration of the events that took place or not? Because you seem to just be avoiding that fact.
I used it as a jumping off point for the rest of my research.
You really need to try harder.
Okay and what did your research lead to? Because there is a timeline of what happened.
When Biden made that statement to Ukraine officials, how long before the prosecutor was fired? And when did the US pay up?
This information is crucial to your argument.
You are literally so close to breaking free from the programming and actually understanding how they put truth out but hide it behind contradiction.
Right but I’d need to know that it’s true. I don’t want to just assume it.