Hope this is allowed! I've browsed on this site for a while, even had another username where I engaged in some fairly civil debates with other users before I was banned due to not being a Q follower.
Interested in having a friendly discussion with anyone who's up for it!
A bit about me:
I'm a mechanical engineer working in product marketing I live in a major city, Chicago, and have pretty much only voted democrat I am a homeowner I have followed conspiracies for a while based solely on my own curiosity, and by and large found that a lot of the major ones (pizzagate, Q) don't make a ton of sense, but I'm not here to argue that. I think we're just gonna have different opinions on it.
All said, happy to have a casual AMA! Not interested in flamebaiting or arguing
I am doing research. He never admitted that it was his laptop. You saying it's his signature isn't him admitting to it.
LOL dude. Try harder. I am not going to do all of your research for you.
((insert pepridge farms remembers meme))
I remember way back when a signature on a receipt was a primary evidentiary document. But, here we are.
Ya, you pulled those drugs out of my pocket, but they're not mine.
C'mon man...
Edit to add:
I had edited another comment, and had hoped to have done so before you had read it. Apologies.
Here it is:
I'm sure you have countless naked selfies of celebrities you follow. No? You actually don't have folders full of naked selfies of other people? Weird... Same reason that I don't have his laptop dump. Can you honestly suggest that all of his naked selfies, his drug selfies, his pedo selfies, that those all came from someone else's comp?? Dude.
Well...yeah? I mean do you remember the fappening? Leaked photo dumps dropped from hacked iCloud accounts. If photos can be grabbed by nefarious means then it can’t be ruled out as a possibility.
A signature is not an admission because it’s not a signature that’s verified, or has any witness to it. It may have been used as evidence before, but I don’t really consider it an admission.