Firstly, "flat earth," doesn't propose a disk. Secondly, night and day on a flat earth are easily explained in several ways - much more easily than night and day on a ball that continuously arcs and speeds in a variety of directions simultaneously without any ascertainable sensation of motion.
These are all among the first things you'll learn in even a badic 40 minute presentation by even a clown like Eric Dubay - if you haven't gotten past these things, you haven't even looked into the idea yet, m8.
That's right, I haven't. Because nobody has given me a reason to.
Not a disk? OK, what shape?
How are night/day easily explained by flat but not round? Round means that the Sun blocks the light on the opposite side from where the Sun is, and that explains night. Day should be obvious light from the Sun. How does flat explain it better?
A disk assumes space, which neither you or anyone you know has ever been close to, is a real thing.
Remove the outer space programming and look at the world. You're on a textured surface of land where up is up and down is down. The luminaries in the sky are not a product of theoretical nuclear fusion. Actually go outside and look at the stars one night.
Next, take the various movements the Earth is allegedly performing day after day and rectify that with the fact that ancient structures, pyramids and whatnot, where built with constellations in mind - also the stars were already mapped thousands of years ago.
Thousands of years of continuous alignment with the celestial bodies despite going tens of thousands of miles an hour around the sun, while the sun and us go hundreds of thousands of miles an hour around the galactic core and on and on?
Then sit back and realize that basically all of what you know about all this was given to you by completely untestable, unrepeatable means from figures of authority that you are never to question. You should see the same pattern emerging as you've seen across many other areas of waking up.
One model proposes a smaller local sun, the other proposes a 93 million mile distant sun that just happens to be the same size from Earth as the 240,000 thousand mile distant moon.
I’m not saying I believe this model, but one that was thought provoking was that the day/night can still be explained by the sun being much closer and traveling in a circle.
One attempt to model compared the light/shadow to the yin/yang symbol.
Whether the model is correct or not I wouldn’t be surprised if that concept was part of what the yin/yang symbol was supposed to represent.
Firstly, "flat earth," doesn't propose a disk. Secondly, night and day on a flat earth are easily explained in several ways - much more easily than night and day on a ball that continuously arcs and speeds in a variety of directions simultaneously without any ascertainable sensation of motion.
These are all among the first things you'll learn in even a badic 40 minute presentation by even a clown like Eric Dubay - if you haven't gotten past these things, you haven't even looked into the idea yet, m8.
That's right, I haven't. Because nobody has given me a reason to.
Not a disk? OK, what shape?
How are night/day easily explained by flat but not round? Round means that the Sun blocks the light on the opposite side from where the Sun is, and that explains night. Day should be obvious light from the Sun. How does flat explain it better?
A disk assumes space, which neither you or anyone you know has ever been close to, is a real thing.
Remove the outer space programming and look at the world. You're on a textured surface of land where up is up and down is down. The luminaries in the sky are not a product of theoretical nuclear fusion. Actually go outside and look at the stars one night.
Next, take the various movements the Earth is allegedly performing day after day and rectify that with the fact that ancient structures, pyramids and whatnot, where built with constellations in mind - also the stars were already mapped thousands of years ago.
Thousands of years of continuous alignment with the celestial bodies despite going tens of thousands of miles an hour around the sun, while the sun and us go hundreds of thousands of miles an hour around the galactic core and on and on?
Then sit back and realize that basically all of what you know about all this was given to you by completely untestable, unrepeatable means from figures of authority that you are never to question. You should see the same pattern emerging as you've seen across many other areas of waking up.
One model proposes a smaller local sun, the other proposes a 93 million mile distant sun that just happens to be the same size from Earth as the 240,000 thousand mile distant moon.
I’m not saying I believe this model, but one that was thought provoking was that the day/night can still be explained by the sun being much closer and traveling in a circle.
One attempt to model compared the light/shadow to the yin/yang symbol.
Whether the model is correct or not I wouldn’t be surprised if that concept was part of what the yin/yang symbol was supposed to represent.