It's a cute idea, but highly flawed, and that's why Trump said he would not use another party.
We will soon see if that idea is flawed or not based on the production of the republican traitor party led special council investigation of John Durham. I do not foresee the American public tolerating any more "failures" from the republican side of the uni-party swamp. And I doubt, and hope that Trump will not either.
Using another party will by default lose you voters. There's a reason the libertarian party is the joke that it is. You need to utilize the mainstream tools available. Will the people tolerate more failures? Probably not. But they will simply vote in a different Republican, who shares Trump's values... Like we see happening at a more frequent rate. This is a long game, expecting easy victories is to defeat yourself. In due time I think people will find that they are responsible for the travesties committed by the re-elected. This idea that we bear no responsibility for the corruption in our government is going to lead us right back to our previously current condition. The Republican Party can be a force for good, if the people educate themselves and maintain involvement.
I agree that it would be preferable for the republican party to save itself by strongly aligning itself with Trump, and America first policies. But I'm not seeing that happening.
There's a reason the libertarian party is the joke that it is. You need to utilize the mainstream tools available.
Trump doesn't need the mainstream tools that other candidates need. The American public will fund him directly, at the expense of the GOP, and RNC, who will lose funding as a result. We already see it happening. We already know what Trump stands for, and publicity seeks him. He needs nothing at all from the uni-party.
But rather than trying to convince you of that through debate, allow me to suggest a thought experiment for you explore on your own.
Imagine that the GOP fields Mike Pence, or Mitt Romney (or some other establishment ass-wipe) as their candidate for president in 2024 due to the failure of the republican party to correct the fraudulent 2020 election.
Now imagine how the American public responds at the voting booth if Trump decides to run for president as a write-in candidate, or third party. Imagine how the public votes if ANY real patriot runs as an outsider presidential candidate in 2024. I think you will find that the outcome for the republican party is the same- lose, or lose.
"Trump doesn't need the mainstream tools that other candidates need. The American public will fund him directly, at the expense of the GOP, and RNC, who will lose funding as a result. We already see it happening. We already know what Trump stands for, and publicity seeks him. He needs nothing at all from the uni-party."
Trump wouldn't have been elected without MSM. Period. No candidate could pay enough money to get the airtime he got. Furthermore, yes, you do need to use mainstream functions to access more people, as can be demonstrated here, no one finds this place because they were randomly typing in the address bar. If he needed nothing he would form his own party, which he expressly stated would split the voter base. Need is a strong word, but it's smarter to play the game than it is to wholesale dismantle it because we weren't smart enough to vote someone out.
"Imagine that the GOP fields Mike Pence, or Mitt Romney (or some other establishment ass-wipe) as their candidate for president in 2024 due to the failure of the republican party to correct the fraudulent 2020 election.
Now imagine how the American public responds at the voting booth if Trump decides to run for president as a write-in candidate, or third party. Imagine how the public votes if ANY real patriot runs as an outsider presidential candidate in 2024. I think you will find that the outcome for the republican party is the same- lose, or lose."
This is my point though. If the GOP would like to keep their seats, they need to follow the will of the voters. If the voters aren't smart enough to vote someone out who is not representing them, then you can make whatever party you want and it will have the same effect. If Trump enters as a third party or write in candidate, he won't even be in the debates. I like your idealism, but the situation is a bit more complex. Trump cannot do this on his own, period. Better to use the enemies weapons against them, than to dismantle them strictly because they were the enemies.
We will soon see if that idea is flawed or not based on the production of the republican traitor party led special council investigation of John Durham. I do not foresee the American public tolerating any more "failures" from the republican side of the uni-party swamp. And I doubt, and hope that Trump will not either.
Using another party will by default lose you voters. There's a reason the libertarian party is the joke that it is. You need to utilize the mainstream tools available. Will the people tolerate more failures? Probably not. But they will simply vote in a different Republican, who shares Trump's values... Like we see happening at a more frequent rate. This is a long game, expecting easy victories is to defeat yourself. In due time I think people will find that they are responsible for the travesties committed by the re-elected. This idea that we bear no responsibility for the corruption in our government is going to lead us right back to our previously current condition. The Republican Party can be a force for good, if the people educate themselves and maintain involvement.
I agree that it would be preferable for the republican party to save itself by strongly aligning itself with Trump, and America first policies. But I'm not seeing that happening.
Trump doesn't need the mainstream tools that other candidates need. The American public will fund him directly, at the expense of the GOP, and RNC, who will lose funding as a result. We already see it happening. We already know what Trump stands for, and publicity seeks him. He needs nothing at all from the uni-party.
But rather than trying to convince you of that through debate, allow me to suggest a thought experiment for you explore on your own.
Imagine that the GOP fields Mike Pence, or Mitt Romney (or some other establishment ass-wipe) as their candidate for president in 2024 due to the failure of the republican party to correct the fraudulent 2020 election.
Now imagine how the American public responds at the voting booth if Trump decides to run for president as a write-in candidate, or third party. Imagine how the public votes if ANY real patriot runs as an outsider presidential candidate in 2024. I think you will find that the outcome for the republican party is the same- lose, or lose.
"Trump doesn't need the mainstream tools that other candidates need. The American public will fund him directly, at the expense of the GOP, and RNC, who will lose funding as a result. We already see it happening. We already know what Trump stands for, and publicity seeks him. He needs nothing at all from the uni-party."
Trump wouldn't have been elected without MSM. Period. No candidate could pay enough money to get the airtime he got. Furthermore, yes, you do need to use mainstream functions to access more people, as can be demonstrated here, no one finds this place because they were randomly typing in the address bar. If he needed nothing he would form his own party, which he expressly stated would split the voter base. Need is a strong word, but it's smarter to play the game than it is to wholesale dismantle it because we weren't smart enough to vote someone out.
"Imagine that the GOP fields Mike Pence, or Mitt Romney (or some other establishment ass-wipe) as their candidate for president in 2024 due to the failure of the republican party to correct the fraudulent 2020 election.
Now imagine how the American public responds at the voting booth if Trump decides to run for president as a write-in candidate, or third party. Imagine how the public votes if ANY real patriot runs as an outsider presidential candidate in 2024. I think you will find that the outcome for the republican party is the same- lose, or lose."
This is my point though. If the GOP would like to keep their seats, they need to follow the will of the voters. If the voters aren't smart enough to vote someone out who is not representing them, then you can make whatever party you want and it will have the same effect. If Trump enters as a third party or write in candidate, he won't even be in the debates. I like your idealism, but the situation is a bit more complex. Trump cannot do this on his own, period. Better to use the enemies weapons against them, than to dismantle them strictly because they were the enemies.