It seems like some Babylon Bee articles are actually comms. Dan Scavino posting this seems more proof of it.
Look close. It talks about people not having to wear Life Jackets anymore because the rainy season is almost over. That’s odd. The rainy season starts Saturday. Weirder yet, we suddenly have an official start to the rainy season. Since when? Since this year apparently. There is a Hurricane Season, but they suddenly said let’s make an official rainy season in the US and Canada.
The Bee says “Rainy season is almost over”, but it’s very specific on the dates. Either the comms is saying the rainy season really is almost finished or you’re supposed to mirror it to understand the real meaning. Aka “flood season is about to begin”.
I don’t like doing dates. Q warned about shills using that to manipulate people. Shills love date pushing because we get disappointed and say “Nothing is happening”. However, the comms do hint at Saturday begin the start of the rainy seasons (storms and floods).
It seems like this comm is best understood by mirroring the meaning.
“Rainy season is almost over” —> “Rainy season is about to begin.”
“Life jackets are not needed” —> “Life jackets are needed” (Likely the comm does not mean literal life jackets. It could refer to something to keep you afloat in a flood or you’ll drown. Aka watch the water “level” or for rising water.)
I believe life jackets refers to something else like an insurance policy or something that will save you from a flood.
The comm hides it well, but it calls the rainy season (or the season for Life Jackets) as being October to April when it should be flipped. Weirder yet it should be May to October, not April to October. Is this just a slip up or deliberate? This is why I think the October to April (10 and 4) hint at Q post #104.
Also it says the measure was put in place because of a rainy of last year. That date seems to refer to lockdowns more than the mask mandate. Dates are not consistent in this post and I think signal that those are comms.
“[E]xperts claimed we would just have to wear the life jackets for a couple of weeks.” Odd that was how the lockdown was pushed, not the mask mandates. On the surface it looks like the life jackets represent the masks, but really they seem more in reference to the lockdowns.
Lockdowns = life jackets? But the bottom of the article equates the life jackets to the masks.
It seems like some Babylon Bee articles are actually comms. Dan Scavino posting this seems more proof of it.
Look close. It talks about people not having to wear Life Jackets anymore because the rainy season is almost over. That’s odd. The rainy season starts Saturday. Weirder yet, we suddenly have an official start to the rainy season. Since when? Since this year apparently. There is a Hurricane Season, but they suddenly said let’s make an official rainy season in the US and Canada.
The Bee says “Rainy season is almost over”, but it’s very specific on the dates. Either the comms is saying the rainy season really is almost finished or you’re supposed to mirror it to understand the real meaning. Aka “flood season is about to begin”.
I don’t like doing dates. Q warned about shills using that to manipulate people. Shills love date pushing because we get disappointed and say “Nothing is happening”. However, the comms do hint at Saturday begin the start of the rainy seasons (storms and floods).
It seems like this comm is best understood by mirroring the meaning.
“Rainy season is almost over” —> “Rainy season is about to begin.”
“Life jackets are not needed” —> “Life jackets are needed” (Likely the comm does not mean literal life jackets. It could refer to something to keep you afloat in a flood or you’ll drown. Aka watch the water “level” or for rising water.)
I believe life jackets refers to something else like an insurance policy or something that will save you from a flood.
The comm hides it well, but it calls the rainy season (or the season for Life Jackets) as being October to April when it should be flipped. Weirder yet it should be May to October, not April to October. Is this just a slip up or deliberate? This is why I think the October to April (10 and 4) hint at Q post #104.
Also it says the measure was put in place because of a rainy of last year. That date seems to refer to lockdowns more than the mask mandate. Dates are not consistent in this post and I think signal that those are comms.
“[E]xperts claimed we would just have to wear the life jackets for a couple of weeks.” Odd that was how the lockdown was pushed, not the mask mandates. On the surface it looks like the life jackets represent the masks, but really they seem more in reference to the lockdowns.
Lockdowns = life jackets? But the bottom of the article equates the life jackets to the masks.