What I do know is what my own experience is. Some people would call it God. I do not. Some things, in their grandness, should not be named at all.
Naming it, is assigning frequency to it. And frequency creates reality, which frequency is always lower through the naming, as you cannot frequent on a higher level than you are now. (the use of are is intentional, as it is not a place)
So, when it comes to experience, I'd rather have the experience than talk about it. And use that experience to grow.
When it comes to logical deduction on matters, we would do well to understand that our language does not deal with fact and truth, but with fiction. Our language is a description of experience, not the experience itself. A bit akin to the platonic cave and the shadows on the wall.
This is the thrust in our society at large, as we are presented with one solution after another, that drags us deeper into artificiality.
e.g. You are watching a movie. The covid vaccine is the gateway vaccine to be part of the Internet of Bodies (IoB) in addition to the internet of Things, which actually encompasses bodies.
What St. Paul, in my view at least, describes when he describes his ascension to the 7th heaven, and when he writes that we do not walk through seeing, but through faith, or through spirit is exactly the issue. It is his experience, that drives his manifestation. Compare the writings of other Apostles and you will see a glaring difference: the need for validation.
When I comb through the New Testament, I find many good things in there, that pertain to spirituality, albeit within a context of a lot of noise.
e.g.: When Paul writes about the fruit of the spirit, he mixes the soul state with behavior: Love, peace and joy are the soul state. The other things mentioned as kindness, long suffering, patience, etc are behaviors.
He inserts things pertaining to manifestation, thereby garbling the actual message, setting a bar, instead of focusing on the soul state and allowing each one to come to their own (re)cognition of how to manifest it.
It would have been a divine miracle had he written after the first three, a question to ponder.
I do not pretend to know or even know.
What I do know is what my own experience is. Some people would call it God. I do not. Some things, in their grandness, should not be named at all.
Naming it, is assigning frequency to it. And frequency creates reality, which frequency is always lower through the naming, as you cannot frequent on a higher level than you are now. (the use of are is intentional, as it is not a place)
So, when it comes to experience, I'd rather have the experience than talk about it. And use that experience to grow.
When it comes to logical deduction on matters, we would do well to understand that our language does not deal with fact and truth, but with fiction. Our language is a description of experience, not the experience itself. A bit akin to the platonic cave and the shadows on the wall.
This is the thrust in our society at large, as we are presented with one solution after another, that drags us deeper into artificiality.
e.g. You are watching a movie. The covid vaccine is the gateway vaccine to be part of the Internet of Bodies (IoB) in addition to the internet of Things, which actually encompasses bodies.
What St. Paul, in my view at least, describes when he describes his ascension to the 7th heaven, and when he writes that we do not walk through seeing, but through faith, or through spirit is exactly the issue. It is his experience, that drives his manifestation. Compare the writings of other Apostles and you will see a glaring difference: the need for validation.
When I comb through the New Testament, I find many good things in there, that pertain to spirituality, albeit within a context of a lot of noise.
e.g.: When Paul writes about the fruit of the spirit, he mixes the soul state with behavior: Love, peace and joy are the soul state. The other things mentioned as kindness, long suffering, patience, etc are behaviors.
He inserts things pertaining to manifestation, thereby garbling the actual message, setting a bar, instead of focusing on the soul state and allowing each one to come to their own (re)cognition of how to manifest it.
It would have been a divine miracle had he written after the first three, a question to ponder.