Has anybody found the Sauce on this? I was able to find the article itself, posted in the Virology Journal, but Fauci isn't listed as one of the authors:
Now that I re-read the post above, I see that it doesn't directly tie Fauci to the Report but ties him to the NIH, and then tries to tie the article/research to NIH. To me, it's a weak connection - because it looks like that Virology Journal isn't actually the 'official publication' of the NIH, though there may be a loose association there.
Yes, he should have known about it and likely does, but to me this isn't a smoking gun. For that, I think you need to visit Rand Paul's interview / grilling of Fauci about the gain-of-function research he was funding in collaboration with the Wuhan lab.
nice find! not sure if this is still enough to take fauci down but its nice to see a place where you can read the text if the study without the paywall
Likewise fren
Has anybody found the Sauce on this? I was able to find the article itself, posted in the Virology Journal, but Fauci isn't listed as one of the authors:
https://virologyj.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1743-422X-2-69
Now that I re-read the post above, I see that it doesn't directly tie Fauci to the Report but ties him to the NIH, and then tries to tie the article/research to NIH. To me, it's a weak connection - because it looks like that Virology Journal isn't actually the 'official publication' of the NIH, though there may be a loose association there.
Yes, he should have known about it and likely does, but to me this isn't a smoking gun. For that, I think you need to visit Rand Paul's interview / grilling of Fauci about the gain-of-function research he was funding in collaboration with the Wuhan lab.
The article is on the NIH website:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1232869/
And Fauci has been in the NIH since 1984.
nice find! not sure if this is still enough to take fauci down but its nice to see a place where you can read the text if the study without the paywall