Why expanding the Arizona Ballot Audit to include other races matters. - The Great Awakening

Why expanding the Arizona Ballot Audit to include other races matters. NCSWIC

posted 3 years ago by Retaining_H2O 3 years ago by Retaining_H2O +515 / -0

Arizona U.S. Senate Mark Kelly (D) 1,716,467 51.2% Martha McSally (R) 1,637,661 48.8%

Arizona U.S. House District 1 Tom O'Halleran (D) 188,469 51.6% Tiffany Shedd (R) 176,709 48.4%

District 2 Ann Kirkpatrick (D) 209,945 55.1% Brandon Martin (R) 170,975 44.9%

Including House and Senate races in the election fraud audit... would come very close to flipping both the U.S. House and Senate control. Proving election fraud may also overturn EVERY vote taken this year in Congress.

Imagine if every vote taken this year in Congress (including voting on nominees for office ie; Attorney General, Secretary of State, etc....) were ALL invalid due to election fraud, which illegally allowed people who lost their elections to hold office.

Now imagine when the same happens in Wisconsin. Democrats will lose their majority in both houses of Congress and it might reverse even that last impeachment.

49 comments

49 comments share save hide report block hide replies

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Comments (49)

sorted by:

▲ 2 ▼

– dirk 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

You mean the military members with 2 moms who spent their childhoods protesting for equity? The military that fires officers for speaking out against critical race theory and the lunacy of transgenders? I'm not sure I want the military in charge of anything at this point.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 4 ▼

– SmolPedeBestPede 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

This is all optics or part of a bigger plan we don’t fully understand yet. The military knows everything and I’m confident they’re 100% on our side. We just have to be patient for the right moment.