Because it is falso hopium at this point. It is presented as breaking news, which in reality is 10 months prior to Nov 3rd,2020. We all know and can prove the media flip flops to meet their narrative.
True about the breaking news part. However, It’s more proof that the Nov 3 2020 election wasn’t the first election that was stolen. This is something that’s been going on for years and has been ignored and allowed to go on... so many people out there think it’s impossible and qannon conspiracy stuff yet there’s all this legit proof out there that it’s been going on for years.
Unless I am seeing something wrong, this article is from Jan 2020.
How does that invalidate the info in the article in anyway?
Because it is falso hopium at this point. It is presented as breaking news, which in reality is 10 months prior to Nov 3rd,2020. We all know and can prove the media flip flops to meet their narrative.
True about the breaking news part. However, It’s more proof that the Nov 3 2020 election wasn’t the first election that was stolen. This is something that’s been going on for years and has been ignored and allowed to go on... so many people out there think it’s impossible and qannon conspiracy stuff yet there’s all this legit proof out there that it’s been going on for years.
Edit:added a word