Deleted databases "No deletion, moved transferred copied, but not deleted" No chain of custody "because this isnt an accredited audit, they did not comply" Nobody knows the admin password not answered because didnt trust the audit Election officials panicking somthing about anonymous threats on twitter Huge amounts of digitally adjudicated ballots didnt come up Not allowed to look at the router "because its a router for the whole county, it has nothing to do with the election"
Router shared with at least 50 other networks
Election run by a private vendor
A hundred lawyers defending election officials
Soros’ Sheriff running interference
Ignored subpoenas
Missing ballots
Hammer and scorecard?
Secretary of state taking campaign gifts from foreign countries
County voter files hacked then covered up
SQL server back door
Not allowed to discuss any of this on socialist media.
Help me fill in the blanks
I read that and I’m stuck at the part where he admits he doesn’t understand what the red x means and then lists every possible scenario other than the one that incriminates themselves.
Why doesn’t he understand what the red x means? He could have asked someone before sending that out to confirm exactly what it means. If he thought they were the ones who wiped the files, why didn’t he say that first and only that? It wasn’t a custom search, they’re files that r studio picked up that were wiped. Here’s a good discussion about it https://forum.r-tt.com/viewtopic.php?t=9369
I’m suggesting that he’s being disingenuous by being vague and misleading about that fact.