Likewise, studies of vaccines in the laboratory with animals or in the clinical trials in people have not found evidence of ADE.
Well this is bold-faced misdirection. They claim PEOPLE trials have not found evidence of ADE. What trials? We are the guinea pigs here. How could they claim this?
We have evaluated, therefore, the neutralizing versus enhancing capabilities of 5 different SARS vaccine formulations. Our results show that ADE was dependent on the immunization strategy with two of five candidate vaccines displaying obvious neutralizing capabilities without triggering SARS-CoVpp entry into immune cells. It is not clear why the other three formulations induced ADE while showing similar neutralizing potencies. We can rule out the lack of recognition/binding to SARS-CoVpp, since all tested sera displayed a clear dose-dependent neutralization of the viral particles over at least four serial dilutions. Furthermore, the total IgG content was comparable among the immunized cohorts, except for the control group that, as expected, had a lower amount (data not shown).
Well this is bold-faced misdirection. They claim PEOPLE trials have not found evidence of ADE. What trials? We are the guinea pigs here. How could they claim this?
Look at the animal studies.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3187504/