I didn't miss anything and stand by my statement, which remains true. Datefagging never has led to anything but disappointment.
Why don't you ask where the "one week" timeframe came from, or why an invented timeframe like that would be valid?
If everyone like Trump, Flynn, Pompeo, etc. went by your suggestion of no hopium until one week before a "happening", then we should never have gotten any hopium at all, right up through today.
Because "it" (whatever it is) won't be soon. Not soon enough, anyway; anons and patriots want something to have already happened. And it may have. We will never find out until after the fact, if at all. That's no reason to keep us in limbo, no hopeful messages to keep us strong.
Here's another angle: If "it" won't happen soon, all the more reason to keep hopium alive!
Maybe Flynn himself doesn't know exactly "when" "it" will occur but knows something is going to occur. Should he remain completely silent?
I think you missed the point he was making. If Flynn knows it won't be soon, then he should stop dealing hopium.
I didn't miss anything and stand by my statement, which remains true. Datefagging never has led to anything but disappointment.
Why don't you ask where the "one week" timeframe came from, or why an invented timeframe like that would be valid?
If everyone like Trump, Flynn, Pompeo, etc. went by your suggestion of no hopium until one week before a "happening", then we should never have gotten any hopium at all, right up through today.
Because "it" (whatever it is) won't be soon. Not soon enough, anyway; anons and patriots want something to have already happened. And it may have. We will never find out until after the fact, if at all. That's no reason to keep us in limbo, no hopeful messages to keep us strong.
Here's another angle: If "it" won't happen soon, all the more reason to keep hopium alive!
Maybe Flynn himself doesn't know exactly "when" "it" will occur but knows something is going to occur. Should he remain completely silent?