The Declaration of Independence is not law, and the Equal Protection Clause is irrelevant in this context. You can show your big smile, and your employer will grin back as they fire you. You can then grin away while the courts ignore you.
The Declaration of Independence is the precursor document which gave the original colonists the right and obligation to establish the Constitution. It is therefore a critical piece of evidence in establishing the meaning of the words used in the Constitution. It is not specifically incorporated by reference, however it can be used when attempting to interpret those clauses. Ultimately it is up to a judge though.
Judges are human, and influenced by popular culture. In the current diseased climate where everything is controlled by the deep state, you may be correct that it will be ignored. That doesn't make it right though, and it is up to all of us to change that. The more that people insist that these conditions be considered, the more likely it is that judge's legal interpretations will begin to take them into account.
You've seen activists judges for years on the left. The only thing preventing judicial activism in the other direction is our will to demand it.
No judges on the right are going to find a fourteenth amendment right to not be required to wear a mask by one’s employer. That’s not a deep state thing.
Everything involving interpretations of the law is influenced by the deep state. We have courts packed with deep state appointed judges. I'm surprised you don't realize that, given the forum where you are participating.
People have no idea!
The Declaration of Independence is not law, and the Equal Protection Clause is irrelevant in this context. You can show your big smile, and your employer will grin back as they fire you. You can then grin away while the courts ignore you.
The Declaration of Independence is the precursor document which gave the original colonists the right and obligation to establish the Constitution. It is therefore a critical piece of evidence in establishing the meaning of the words used in the Constitution. It is not specifically incorporated by reference, however it can be used when attempting to interpret those clauses. Ultimately it is up to a judge though.
Judges are human, and influenced by popular culture. In the current diseased climate where everything is controlled by the deep state, you may be correct that it will be ignored. That doesn't make it right though, and it is up to all of us to change that. The more that people insist that these conditions be considered, the more likely it is that judge's legal interpretations will begin to take them into account.
You've seen activists judges for years on the left. The only thing preventing judicial activism in the other direction is our will to demand it.
No judges on the right are going to find a fourteenth amendment right to not be required to wear a mask by one’s employer. That’s not a deep state thing.
Everything involving interpretations of the law is influenced by the deep state. We have courts packed with deep state appointed judges. I'm surprised you don't realize that, given the forum where you are participating.
Neither is the US CODE.
But you fuck sticks use it against The People all the time.
"The Law" is what ever The People say it is mother fucker.
The US Code is absolutely law; that’s the body of statute law.
Yawn. The law is the Constitution, plus the common law, plus what the people have enacted into statute via their representatives.
I know you are sleepy, but before you go back to sleep, please humor me:
Who and or what is subject to the U.S. Constitution?
Who enacted/ordained the U.S. Constitution?
Who and or what is subject to the U.S. Statues, Codes, And Regulations?