I'm unsure why 2,300 year old banking dynasties who have turned 191 of 195 of the world's nations into their usury debt slaves (see Q post #135-137), would consider their Chinese debt slaves to be anything more than more disposable cattle.
They probably refer to the Chinese people as cattle, for all I nose?
Or are they secret bossum buddies?
I'm unsure why 2,300 year old banking dynasties who have turned 191 of 195 of the world's nations into their usury debt slaves (see Q post #135-137), would consider their Chinese debt slaves to be anything more than more disposable cattle.
They probably refer to the Chinese people as cattle, for all I nose?