In the article there is a whole paragraph which could be distilled into "We can't draw any kind of reliable conclusion because everyone is doing every vaccine study differently." Only Israel with its big Pfizer push has enough consistency, and the conclusion there is that it takes 1.8 people being vaccinated to prevent one more case of infection.
Better reading, thanks. All statements with "might," "could," and "perhaps" belong on The Ancient Aliens show. And aside, why did Israel go so big on Pfizer?
And of course, "cases" is meaningless. Additionally, as we saw, "diagnoses" was pretty much meaningless. So we have a huge steaming pile of lies, based on lies, correlated with lies, reported as truth that is lies, stemming from the father of all lies. How 'bout them apples?
In the article there is a whole paragraph which could be distilled into "We can't draw any kind of reliable conclusion because everyone is doing every vaccine study differently." Only Israel with its big Pfizer push has enough consistency, and the conclusion there is that it takes 1.8 people being vaccinated to prevent one more case of infection.
Better reading, thanks. All statements with "might," "could," and "perhaps" belong on The Ancient Aliens show. And aside, why did Israel go so big on Pfizer?
And of course, "cases" is meaningless. Additionally, as we saw, "diagnoses" was pretty much meaningless. So we have a huge steaming pile of lies, based on lies, correlated with lies, reported as truth that is lies, stemming from the father of all lies. How 'bout them apples?
I was thinking compared to the measles vaccine or some trusted and established vaccine that everyone could relate to.
Makes sense that there's no consistency with these people. It's an absolute jumble.
Speaking of the MMR vaccine, this is what a tangled web can result. A great discussion of legal maneuvers that might apply in other situations. Still in litigation. https://www.skepticalraptor.com/skepticalraptorblog.php/merck-mumps-motions-whistleblowers-the-actual-story/